"Why not simply redefine
legalization as a "nation-wide experiment designed to measure the long-term effect of
the non-medical use of the drug?" -- Suggests Canadas National Paper
(Marijuananews note: The Globe and Mail ranks
right up there with the Ottawa Citizen in quality, but it is a national paper published in
Canadas largest city. Consequently, it has a great impact.)
See
Major Canadian
Papers Carry Op-eds And Editorial Against Marijuana Prohibition.
-- 3 Excellent Examples.
and
"Never
mind freedom of speech or expression, the UN saysthis is a war."
3 Great Columns From The Globe and Mail
and
Globe and Mail,
Canadas National Newspaper Asks, "What Are G8 Leaders Smoking?"
A Truly Devastating Editorial!
and
"Enforcers
Challenge Cannabis Liberation Movement" In Canada Great Journalism!!!
A POTTED ROCK
June 1, 1999
From The Globe and Mail -- Canadas National Newspaper
letters@globeandmail.ca
http://www.globeandmail.ca/
http://forums.theglobeandmail.com/
"What luck for rulers that men do not think." Hitler
said it, but Health Minister Allan Rock might have been quietly hymning the words to
himself as he tried to justify his governments hitherto fruitless search for a
source of "medicinal quality" marijuana.
See
In Canada Only the
Government Has Difficulty Getting Marijuana.
However, "Canadians who want to take part in a clinical trial
will find application forms on Health Canadas Web Site"
The high-grade pot is required for clinical trials aimed at measuring the drugs
therapeutic qualities.
Where to get the vital raw material? Might it be British Columbia, where a clement
climate and native industry have come together to produce a $3-billion to $6-billion
underground economy based on the appeal of "B.C. Bud?" Described as the
"champagne of marijuana," the B.C. potthe result of 30 years of illicit
breeding experiments is so potent that U.S. gourmets are reputedly willing to pay
ten times more for it than the once recherche marijuanas of Mexico.
If you said yes to purchasing B.C. Bud, you clearly dont comprehend the mind of a
politician. Buying a substance of which we are apparently a world leader in producing is
too simple. Better is pretzel-shaped reasoning that argues: Because growing pot is illegal
in Canada, lets just pretend it isnt grown in Canada.
"Acceptable sources of drugs not approved in Canada may be found in countries
where they have been approved," Mr. Rock has written about the situation.
And, true to his pledge, his ministry has been sounding out people as far away as
England as to whether we can buy high-grade pot from them.
This approach, of course, should guarantee that we buy marijuana at the highest
conceivable price. And given the fact that the greatest medical benefit in taking pot is
believed to be linked with the highest levels of the chemical that makes people high, if
we are really lucky, we can be buying a British plant grown from seeds first bred in
British Columbia.
Now if this sounds like the Scots searching for a source of
medicinal Scotch in Morocco, and the French looking for a robust Burgandy in Sweden, you
may be on to something.
The governments position is so obtuse that ones advice for what to do
sounds like a simpletons suggestion. Mr. Rock, put out a contract on medical
marijuana to tender. Guarantee that bidders wont be prosecuted, then watch what a
good source of medicinal-quality, cheap, home-grown drug comes rolling in.
And, oh yes, while youre at it, you might just
decriminalize Canadas world-famous marijuana in the first place. If you find it
politically dicey to announce that in a straight-forward way, why not simply redefine
legalization as a "nation-wide experiment designed to measure the long-term effect of
the non-medical use of the drug?"
Copyright: 1999, The Globe and Mail Company