Vraag Een Politieagent. Go Ahead, Ask A Cop
For Dope. The Dutch Don't Mind New Scientist Special Report
February 19, 1998
See Go Dutch! for more on Holland
New Scientist
letters@newscientist.com
21 February 1998
Marijuana Special Report:
Vraag een politieagent . . .
Go ahead, ask a cop for dope. The Dutch don't mind
It is a weird experience. You walk up to a Dutch policeman, and ask where to get some
marijuana. You are smilingly directed to the nearest "coffee shop", where the
menu offers everything cannabinoid from something called Space Cake to Northern Lights, a
local weed.
In much of the world, this could never happen: the penalties for using cannabis are
severe. But in 1976, the Dutch legalised the possession of small amounts. What has
happened since? Some say that crime has soared, schoolchildren drop out, and heroin
addiction is rife. Others insist the Netherlands is a stoned paradise of peace and love.
"I've visited their parks. Their children walk around like zombies," says Lee
Brown, head of the US Office for National Drug Control Policy. (Ed.
note: The liar is now mayor of Houston.)
"Hard drug use -- heroin and cocaine -- has declined substantially," says
Paul Hager of the Indiana Civil Liberties Union.
Most comments seems to seem to depend on the speaker's politics. So what is the truth
about the great Dutch cannabis experiment?
Hard addicts
"There was no immediate increase in cannabis use after 1976," says Arjan Sas
of the Centre for Drug Research at the University of Amsterdam. "Trends in use have
generally been the same as in other countries." The percentage who regularly use
either cannabis or hard drugs is lower in the Netherlands than in many European countries,
including Britain. And the number of hard drug addicts in the Netherlands has not
increased for a decade, while their average age is rising.
Dutch statistics, however, are far from conclusive. The first national survey of drug
use in the Netherlands is only just being done. There have been smaller-scale studies of
particular towns or age groups but comparing them is fraught with statistical problems.
Nonetheless, Dirk Korf of the Institute of Criminology at the University of Amsterdam
has used the smaller studies to estimate that 3 per cent of Dutch people had used cannabis
at least once in 1970, rising to 12 per cent in 1991. The best guess for 1998 is 14 per
cent.
Most of that increase, says Korf, is because "lifetime use" figures are
cumulative: people who had used it in 1970 are still around, and are joined by younger
users over time. More to the point, he says, is to compare the number of teenagers who
start using cannabis. In 1970, he estimates that 20 per cent of all Dutch 18-year-olds
surveyed had used it at least once; in 1980, that had fallen to 15 per cent. By 1987, it
was 18 per cent, an increase, Korf says, that mirrors the increase in the number of coffee
shops in the mid-1980s. Now, about 30 per cent of Dutch 18-year-olds are said to have
tried cannabis, though some researchers think that is an overestimate based on studies of
Amsterdam where coffee shops abound.
But did more people try cannabis after it was legalised? It seems so. At the Centre for
Drug Research, Sas and Peter Cohen divided Amsterdamers surveyed in 1987, 1990 and 1994
into two groups -- those that were born before 1958, who were 18 or older in 1976, and
those that were born after 1976, for whom cannabis has always been legal. Only 19 per cent
of the oldies had tried cannabis, compared with 38 per cent of the younger group.
That difference could be partly misleading. Dutch surveys show that the vast majority
of people who use cannabis do so almost exclusively in their 20s. The drug became common
in the Netherlands in the mid-1960s, so for the older group members who were already more
than 30, it was too late. Nonetheless, the data suggest that more people did try cannabis
after decriminalisation.
But what counts, though, says Sas, is how many continue to use it. In Amsterdam, 55 per
cent of people who say they have tried cannabis only end up using it a couple of dozen
times or less. The rest may have used it more often, but more than half have not used it
in the past month. The data show, says Sas, that legalising cannabis may make you more
likely to try it, but it does not make it more likely that you will continue to use it.
But it is by no means certain that the first half of that conclusion is correct. Korf finds that surveys of the number of Germans who use cannabis
"virtually parallels" the peaks and troughs in Dutch surveys between 1970 and
1990, even though Germany has prohibited cannabis throughout the period. Surveys of young
Americans in the 1970s and 1980s found "substantially higher prevalence rates"
than in Holland, peaking at 50 per cent of high-school seniors in 1980, although the US
was strongly prohibitionist.
Legal immunity
Since then, says Korf, there have been no discernible differences in use between US
states that have decriminalised, and those that have not, while cannabis use has increased
in the US and Western Europe since 1990, regardless of the legal framework. "There is
no appreciable causal connection between the Dutch decriminalisation of cannabis and the
rate at which cannabis use has evolved," Korf concludes.
Last year, Robert MacCoun of the University of California at Berkeley and Peter Reuter
of the University of Maryland, compared trends in cannabis use in the US, Norway (which
bans it) and the Netherlands. They also concluded that "reductions in criminal
penalties have little effect on drug use, at least for marijuana".
While the 1976 legislation may have had little effect on cannabis
use, how effective has it been in its main goal of keeping people off harder drugs? The
Netherlands has fewer addicts per capita than Italy, Spain, Switzerland, France or
Britain, and far fewer than the US. Frits Knaak of the Trimbos Institute in Utrecht, the
Dutch national institute for mental health and addiction, says the number of hard drug
addicts in the country has been the same for a decade because fewer young people are
joining their ranks. The average Dutch junkie is now 44 years old and only 0.3 per cent of
Dutch teenagers had tried cocaine in 1994, compared with 1.7 per cent in the US. In the
Netherlands, virtually everyone who uses drugs tries cannabis first, and many seem content
to go no further.
Cannabis addiction and other problems are uncommon. "The number of cannabis users
treated in drugs outpatient facilities is low," says Knaak. "In 1996, there were
only 2000 [patients] in the whole country -- just 0.3 per cent of all Dutch cannabis
users."
Of those, 42 per cent "are also having trouble with alcohol or other drugs -- the
rest usually just need counselling to help change their lifestyle", says Sas. Most
people who find cannabis causing trouble with concentration or memory at work or school,
he says, apply rules, like no smoking on week nights, or they limit their intake.
This self-policing seems to work. Dutch teenagers get among the
highest scores in the world on international science and mathematics tests. If there are
serious problems caused by legalising marijuana, then twenty-plus years of the Dutch
experiment has not revealed what they are.
Debora Mackenzie
The New Scientist Drops Its
Bombshell The UK Disaster for Prohibitionists Gets Even Worse. Introduction
A Safe High? Claim One: "Critical
Skills Related To Attention, Memory And Learning Are Impaired Among Heavy Users Of
Marijuana .. ." New Scientist Marijuana Special Report
Claim Two: "More Than 120 000 People In The US Seek
Treatment Each Year For Their Marijuana Addiction"
Claim Three: "Smoking Marijuana Can Lead To Abnormal
Functioning Of Lung Tissue." New Scientist Special Report
Claim Four: "Marijuana Causes
Long-Term Changes In The Brain Similar To Those Seen With Other Drugs Of Abuse."
High Anxieties -- What the WHO Doesn't Want You To Know
About Cannabis -- New Scientist Special Report
Drop in with Dr
Dave Smith at the Haight Ashbury Free Clinic -- Sort of A Dissenting View New Scientist
Special Report
Short and Not Very Good Look at Medical Cannabis
Are Aerosols
the Future of the Spliff? New Scientist Special Report