From Hassela Nordic Network
http://mn.medstroms.se/cgi-bin/hassela/hpr-e.sh?p9805191.txtSee
Australia, New
Zealand, Sweden, The International Prohibitionist Counterattack, and How We Can Use The
Internet
and "All
forms of differentiation between so-called 'soft' drugs and 'hard' drugs must cease,"
Says Swedish Conference.
and
Analysis By Dutch
Center Shows
"Claims Regarding Effectiveness Of The Swedish Drug Policy Cannot Be Proven."
Press release May 19, 1998
THE SWEDISH QUEEN DISSOCIATES HERSELF FROM THOSE FORCES THAT WANT TO MAKE NARCOTIC
DRUGS AN ACCEPTED PRODUCT FOR EVERYDAY USE.
Her Majesty the Queen of Sweden gave the opening speech at the Hassela Nordic
Network´s annual conference which took place last weekend.
The following is the full text of the opening speech.
"There is a determined stance against drugs in our country. Advocates of a liberal
drug policy in other parts of the world often use Sweden as a negative reference. Swedish
representatives are regarded as the most persistent opponents to efforts to make narcotic
drugs a respectable part of society.
Personally I am very proud of this. The fact that so many Swedish citizens
uncompromisingly reject narcotic drugs constitutes the sound base for our relative
successes so far.
I want to contribute to the strengthening of this base. That is why I have chosen to
publicly and strongly commit myself to the fight against drugs.
In doing so I want to influence everybody who is listening. As fellow human beings and
as parents it is not enough for us to completely hand over these important questions to
the experts and the professional debaters. We must all become visible to make it possible
for our society to be strong enough to continue to maintain the necessary, strict stance
on drug-related matters.
I mentioned relative successes. Of course, we are not completely unaffected by what is
happening in the surrounding world. Since 1989, the number of
students in the 9th grade in Stockholm, who tried narcotic drugs, doubled. In
certain areas, e.g. Stockholm, the numbers are even higher.
This is most worrying. As parents we may choose to interpret these statistics as
temporary changes in a course of events that we cannot influence. But if we choose to do
that, we must also accept the responsibility for the talks that we did not have with our
children and also accept the responsibility for not having said no in time.
The advocates of liberalisation, or even legalisation, of drugs
claim that, above all, it is a question of freedom. The possibility to get intoxicated
gives an opportunity to escape reality.
But it also makes the fight for the common
good, personal well-being and the positive development of children and families a
secondary issue. Instead of tackling everyday problems in a constructive way, people
choose to get away from them through intoxication.