Scottish Scientist
Timidly Calls For New Cannabis Law But Sounds So Bold
See
President Of The
International Cannabinoid Research Society Writes On Cannabis As A Medicine
and
British Medical
Journal Reports That UK "Experts" Will Speed Up Work On Alternatives To Medical
Marijuana
and
British Medical
Association and Government Graciously Allow Sick and Dying Synthetic Cannabis In
2 Years, Maybe
and
Scottish Nurses
To Back Medical Cannabis "Despite Claims By Some Doctors That It Causes Paranoia,
Even Insanity." May 6, 1998
Aberdeen Press & Journal
editor@pj.ajl.co.uk
http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/
By David Perry
(Ed. note: This article illustrates the moral and intellectual
bankruptcy of the therapeutic state. That it is actually necessary to argue against
criminalizing sick people for self-medicating will someday seem as morally absurd as
urging that slaves not be overly abused. That modern medicine for all its very real
marvels should live in mortal fear of someone using a plant is surely less than
petty and pathetic. That a "scientist" should be considered bold for advocating
derivatives of the forbidden plant is anti-science. That the scientist should say that
smoking the plant causes cancer without any supporting evidence and without regard
to dose or method of inhalation makes a mockery of the scientific method. That he
should say this in the context of a medical regime that regularly administers drugs which
have lethal side-effects for hundreds of thousands of patients is surreal. That the
government of a modern state would interfere in even this timid exercise is simply mass
murder. Or is there a nicer term for a policy that kills large numbers of people by
deliberate government policy? I dont want to seem extreme, just because people are
being forced to die in pain. To pretend that the emperor isn't naked is fatuous. To
pretend that he doesn't have blood on his hands is cowardly and complicitous.)
SCIENTIST CALLS FOR NEW CANNABIS LAW
A Leading Aberdeen academic is to urge Parliament to legalise cannabis as a medicine
which doctors can prescribe.
Dr. Roger Pertwee of Aberdeen University is to tell a House of Lords committee a strong
case can be made out on the grounds of "commonsense and compassion" for allowing
cannabis derivatives to treat muscle spasm.
He has submitted written evidence to the Science and Technology
Committee, studying the medical use of the banned drug, that there is sufficient evidence
to warrant additional clinical studies with cannabis-derived medicines for the management
of several disorders including multiple sclerosis, spinal injury, glaucoma, bronchial
asthma and pain.
Dr. Pertwee, reader in Biomedical Sciences in the Institute of Medical Sciences,
describes in detail how the various constituents that make up the cannabis used by drug
abusers can help those suffering crippling medical conditions.
He reveals that one derivative is already licensed for use to suppress nausea and
vomiting caused by life-saving anti-cancer drugs.
And he suggests another "may also have therapeutic uses, for example in reducing
memory deficits associated with ageing or neurological diseases."
Dr. Pertwee insists smoking cannabis is toxic and probably causes
cancer, but it can be taken orally, and tincture of cannabis was available under
prescription in the UK until 1971.
Some individuals "self medicate" by eating cannabis leaves or resin in cakes
or fudge, or even drink cannabis tea.
In his evidence, he said legal prescribing would seem better than
many otherwise law-abiding patients who feel so strongly that they should have to
self-medicate with cannabis having to risk discovery and punishment.
Dr. Pertwee will have to defend his views before experts on the committee on Tuesday
May 12.