From Harpers
Magazinehttp://www.harpers.org/
June, 1998
HALFWAY HOUSE
From a letter sent in February by Representative Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.) to
Representative Joe Barton (R., Tex.).
Dear Joe:
I read with interest your renewed push to subject Members of Congress and staff to
random drug testing.
As I understand your position, you believe that Congress should "provide an
example" by subjecting its Members and staff to intrusive, mandatory drug tests (paid
for with public dollars). I have noted that you do not allege that any illegal drug use is
ongoing. I further understand that you and four other Members
regularly take tests for drugs that you do not consume.
Perhaps a more productive and cost-effective alternative is in order. I have observed
personally the abuse of addictive substances on the floor of the
House in violation of the House rules. I am referring to the frequent and obnoxious
smoking of cigars and cigarettes. Imagine all those Members puffing away later this year
as we consider the "tobacco settlement." This will certainly raise
questions in the minds of the millions of Americans who view the proceedings on C-SPAN.
Simple and inexpensive enforcement of the House rules could bring this practice to an
abrupt halt.
Also, Congress, especially in late-night sessions, sees the same occasional
alcohol abuse that occurs in other workplaces across the country. If Congress were
to effectively curtail this abuse, we would exceed the modest goal you have set with your
purely symbolic testing program.
Our electronic voting machines could be equipped with Breathalyzers. Before casting a
vote (say after 8:00 P.M.) each member would have to breathe into the machine. Any Member
whose blood-alcohol level exceeded .08 would be locked out. This would give Members a
strong incentive to keep their legal drinking within the sobriety limits set by many
states for driving. We could even adopt a motto: ZERO TOLERANCE FOR
VWI (Voting While Intoxicated). Members would be recorded as "incapable of
voting," which should provide a strong behavioral incentive for moderation of alcohol
consumption and help restore public confidence in the voting behavior of the Congress.
Sincerely, Peter DeFazio