The Real Data On Teen
Marijuana "Abuse Treatment" What The Media Dont Tell Us:
"Half of marijuana treatment admissions were referred through the criminal justice
system."
-- Analysis By Richard Cowan
July 15, 1999Earlier this week, Joe Califanos National Center
on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) achieved something of a media coup by getting the
usual slavish coverage of their prohibitionist propaganda.
The part that got the most coverage was their claim that government data showed that
more teens "entered treatment for marijuana abuse and dependence than for any other
drug including alcohol."
See
The AP Gives Califano
A Free Ride For Prohibitionist Propaganda
This is a classic example of lying with numbers that almost say what they claim, but may
mean something else altogether:
"Sounding an alarm for parents, the report finds that in
1996 (the latest numbers available) more teens age 19 and younger entered treatment for
marijuana abuse and dependence than for any other drug including alcohol. In fact, nearly
as many teens and children were admitted to treatment for marijuana as were admitted for
abuse and dependence on all other substances combined.
Of the nearly 181,784 teens and children who entered treatment in 1996, nearly half --
48.2% or 87,687-- were admitted for abuse or addiction to marijuana alone: 19.3%
(35,069) were admitted for alcohol with a secondary drug; 11.9% (21,594) for alcohol
alone; 2.9 % (5,323) for smoked cocaine, 2.4% for methamphetamines (4,354); and 2.3%
(4,166) for heroin). More than half the teens in treatment for marijuana were between the
ages of 15 and 17."
See
Califano Says, "Teens who smoke
marijuana are playing a dangerous game of Russian roulette."
And Other Brilliant Insights.
First, it should be obvious that marijuana can be misused or abused by anyone, and young
people are almost certainly at greater risk than adults when they use any psychoactive
substance. The Dutch data clearly demonstrates that a small percentage of marijuana users
seek treatment on their own.
See
"Tremendous
Increase In The Number Of Dutch Cannabis Users Asking For Help"
Swedish Prohibitionists Claim
Second, the prevalence of a problem does not measure its severity.
Marijuana is by far the most widely used illicit substance, so it would hardly be
surprising that more people seek treatment for it than for less commonly used substances,
which are much more dangerous. For most teens, the drugs that they can most easily find,
alcohol, tobacco and marijuana, will be those which they will tend to abuse. On the other
hand, very few are treated for PCP abuse. Would even Joe Califano claim that marijuana is
as dangerous as PCP?
As for the claim that more teens "enter treatment" for marijuana than
alcohol, it should also be obvious that alcohol is both more dangerous for the individual
and more widely "abused" than is marijuana. So these numbers really tell us that
our "treatment" priorities are badly imbalanced. One indication of this is the
fact that more than half of those being "treated" for marijuana also report
"using" alcohol.
See
If Telling
The Truth About Binge Drinking Works Better Than "Hardline Crackdowns." What
About Marijuana?
Now lets look at the source of the CASA data on "TEDS" Treatment
Episode Data Set :
(A "treatment episode" is an admission to some sort of "treatment"
program.)
SAMHSA Marijuana Data
From http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/teds/teds96htm/MJ.HTM
on July 15, 1999:
"Marijuana/Hashish
- Primary marijuana abuse accounted for 13 percent of TEDS admissions in 1996 (Table3.2).
- Marijuana admissions were generally male, white, and young (Table3.1). Three-quarters
were male, 60 percent were white, and 45 percent were under 20 years old. Marijuana was
the most common primary substance problem among admissions under 20 (Table3.2).
Marijuana use began at an early age among primary marijuana admissionsabout half
had first used marijuana by the age of 14, and three-quarters by the age of 16 (Table3.5).
Half of marijuana treatment admissions were referred through the criminal justice
system (Table3.7).
Secondary use of alcohol was reported by 59 percent of admissions for primary
marijuana abuse (Table3.8)"
(There are hyperlinks to all of the tables on the SAMHSA TEDS page.)
In short, half of all those in "treatment" for marijuana were sent by the
courts. They may or may not have needed "treatment" but there is no way
of knowing. The teens may or may not have been sent by the courts at the same ratio, but
it may well have been at a higher rate because teens have very few rights.Also, it may
well be that others were sent by schools, or by their parents, whether or not they really
had a problem.
Moreover, most of them 59% -- reported "secondary" use of alcohol.
(No, these numbers do not match the CASA numbers.) How is the determination made that
marijuana was the primary problem for them?
In a context in which any use of marijuana is classified as "abuse," it is
very difficult to know what the data really mean.
Also note that most of those in these programs started marijuana use at a very early
age. Consequently, these numbers tell us very little about the risks associated with later
onset marijuana use by teens. Certainly, very early use would seem to be more problematic,
and perhaps indicative of other problems, such as parental neglect.
In reality, the only certain conclusion from this data is that marijuana prohibition is
a spectacular failure at keeping even very young children from getting and misusing
marijuana. As the CASA report says, "CASAs 1998 teen
survey reported that 19% of middle school students and 45% of high school students say
they can buy marijuana in an hour or less."
In an ideal world, proponents of a given social policy would not abuse statistics to
mislead the public on an important subject. However, in the real world, they do, and that
is why we need for the media with their enormous resources to check on what they report as
facts.
See
Marijuana Prohibition,
Media Criticism, Copyrights and the 8th and 9th Commandments.
It took me only a few minutes to find the SAMHSA numbers. Maybe the AP and the San Jose
Mercury dont have Internet access. Perhaps it will spread to Silicone Valley,
whatever that is.