KUBBY CASE TO GO BEFORE GRAND JURY
(Marijuananews note: This is good journalism that explains how the
system really works, which is very unusual.)February 9, 1999
From the Auburn Journal
ElPatricio@aol.com
By Patrick McCartney, Journal City Editor
Former Libertarian candidate Steve Kubbys marijuana cultivation case will be
presented to a criminal grand jury, a Placer County prosecutor confirmed on Monday. The
grand jury hearing is set for Feb. 17. With the decision, the district attorneys
office will withdraw the existing indictment of marijuana cultivate and possession for
sale against Steve Kubby and his wife Michele.
See
California
Libertarians Form Prop. 215 Blue Ribbon Committee In Wake of Kubby Arrests
and
After Interview With
Steve Kubby, Orange County Weekly Says
Arresting Him "May Have Been Prop 215 Opponents' Worst Mistake"
and links
The Kubbys were arrested Jan. 19 at their Olympic Valley home by the multiagency North
Tahoe Task Force, which seized 265 plants growing in four rooms. Steve Kubby, 52, openly
espoused the use of medical marijuana for his rare adrenal cancer during a 1998 campaign
for governor. He was instrumental in qualifying Californias successful Proposition
215 in 1996, which allows the use of marijuana with a physicians approval.
Christopher Cattran, a Placer County deputy district attorney, said criminal grand
juries are often used by the countys prosecutors. "We view the grand jury as a
body of independent people who will impartially review all the evidence and render a fair
decision," Cattran said. "Its not unusual, especially in Placer County,
for us to go in front of a grand jury."
Like the preliminary hearing it replaces, a grand jury is
required to determine whether enough evidence exists to refer a case to trial. Dale Wood,
a Tahoe City attorney representing the Kubbys, said the decision would deprive Kubby of a
public hearing of his case. Grand jury proceedings are secret, and the transcript is
usually sealed. In addition, defendants are not allowed to be represented by counsel in
the proceedings, which serves as an alternative for preliminary hearings by a magistrate
in court.
Wood called the grand jury hearing an "archaic" procedure, and said he had
advised the Kubbys not to attend.
"We are deprived of public and open hearings," Wood
said of the grand jury process. "A first-year law student can get an indictment
out of a grand jury."
To compensate for the defendants lack of legal
counsel, Cattran said the prosecutor carries an extra duty in proceedings.
"It is the responsibility of the (prosecution) to present all sides of the case to
the grand jury," Cattran said. "It is our responsibility to present all
exculpatory evidence to the jurors."
The Placer district attorney also sought a grand jury hearing for
another recent medical marijuana case, involving Rocklin dentist Michael Baldwin and his
wife Georgia. There case is pending.
Copyright: 1999 Auburn Journal