See
Not Fit to Print?
The Medical Marijuana Class Action Hearing Media Blackout Documented By Mapinc(Marijuananews note: Finally, they are paying attention.
The two items here create another instance of
cyber-synchronicity, in which juxtaposing two stories that appear on the same day
gives added meaning to them both.
In the first, The Inquirer tells its readers that a Federal judge
wants the government to explain why only eight people can have medical marijuana. In the
second, Al Gore comes out in favor of better labeling for over-the-counter-drugs,
virtually all of which are more dangerous than marijuana. Only on the Internet
)
See
Major Disaster For
Marijuana Prohibition!
Federal Court To Allow Class Action To Proceed On Equal Protection Question:
Why do eight people have the right to receive medical marijuana from the government,
but no one else does?
and links
JUDGE DECLINES TO DISMISS MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAWSUIT
From The Philadelphia Inquirer
Inquirer.opinion@phillynews.com
http://www.phillynews.com/
March 11, 1999
Plaintiffs seeking to legalize the drug for medicinal use will get their day in federal
court.
By Joseph A. Slobodzian INQUIRER STAFF WRITER
A federal judge yesterday refused to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks
to legalize the medical use of marijuana, ruling that the plaintiffs deserved the chance
to prove the government had no reason to deny the drug to seriously ill people.
"The answer must come from facts, not the abstractions and dogma presently
in the record," wrote U.S. District Judge Marvin Katz in a 25-page opinion and order.
Katz's ruling keeps alive a class-action lawsuit that many legal experts assumed had no
chance of success when it was filed in July.
Justice Department spokesman Brian Steel said lawyers had not had the chance to review
Katz's ruling and could not comment. "Our basic position is
that marijuana remains an illegal drug," Steel said.
Lawrence Elliott Hirsch, the Center City lawyer who filed the suit on behalf of 165
people nationwide, praised the opinion as a "tremendous job of analysis. . . .
Whatever the ultimate outcome, the judge has done an excellent job of framing the
issues."
See www.fairlaw.org
Some medical researchers have said marijuana seems to help in treating glaucoma and
combating the nausea caused by drugs used in treating cancer and AIDS. Although a
synthetic form of a key compound of marijuana has been marketed as the prescription drug
Marinol, the lawsuit contends it is not as effective as smoking the herb itself.
In some ways, Katz handed victories to both sides. He denied Hirsch's motion for a
judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and granted the government's motion to dismiss
Hirsch's most novel claim -- that, unlike the 18th Amendment's ill-fated ban on alcohol
except for medicinal use, Congress prohibited marijuana improperly in the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970.
Katz wrote that numerous federal courts have upheld the 1970 law.
But the judge said it was premature to dismiss the plaintiffs' claim that they were
being denied equal protection of the law.
Despite the longstanding prohibition of marijuana, the lawsuit contends, the government
in 1978 settled a federal lawsuit by implementing a limited "compassionate use"
program in which as many as 300 government-grown marijuana cigarettes a month were
provided to people found to have serious medical conditions that benefited from marijuana
use.
About half of the 14 people admitted into the program -- it was closed to new
participants in 1992 -- still receive the drug. "The court
cannot say," Katz wrote, "that the government's decision to give marijuana to
several people who are ill and the government's refusal to give it to the plaintiffs who
are also ill is rational as a matter of law when plaintiffs have not had the opportunity
to try to prove otherwise."

(Marijuananews note: Consider this as the context of the medical
marijuana debate.)
New Rules Require More Easily Read US Drug Labels
See
Lethal Dose Of
Cynicism From Makers Of Tylenol Poll On Aspirin Dangers
Context Of Medical Marijuana Debate
and great links
March 11 1999
By Lisa Richwine
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal officials announced new rules
Thursday to help prevent people getting sick from the medications they takerequiring
over-the-counter drugs for coughs, colds and other ailments to carry labels that are
easier to read and understand.
The Food and Drug Administration regulations aim to cut
misuse of the drugs, which cause 170,000 hospitalizations in the United States each year,
the officials said.
Elderly people often have trouble reading the small type on current drug packaging, the
officials said. Children also are at risk because pediatric dosing information is
frequently buried among other instructions.
"This is going to have a big impact on the Americans who use these
over-the-counter drugs," Vice President Al Gore said. "These drug labels will be
going from indecipherable to easy to read."
Gore unveiled the plans at a White House ceremony with FDA Commissioner Jane Henney,
Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala and three pharmacists. The vice
president, who is gearing up for a run for the presidency, pulled out his glasses to
demonstrate the trouble with current labels.
"Its a strain on your eyes, and you have to really look hard to get the
information youre looking for," Gore said.
Americans purchase five billion over-the-counter products
each year, and are four times as likely to seek that type of medication rather than seeing
their doctors for a prescription, Gore said.
The new regulations, which apply to more than 100,000 drugs and cosmetics, set minimum
standards for type size on most labels.
Manufacturers will be required to present the ingredients of a
drug, as well as the correct dosage, warnings and associated risks.
The changes also set up a standardized format that would list ingredients in the same
place on each product, as well as provide an explanation of what symptoms they treat.
In addition to improving safety, the new rules will enable consumers to make health
care choices more quickly, Henney said.
Some products will carry the changes as early as this spring, and
all over-the counter medications must have the new labels within six years.
(Marijuananews note: Six years? They have really great lobbyists!)
The FDA also will launch a promotional campaign to make the public aware of the
changes.
Joe Smith, a pharmacist from Falls Church, Virginia, said many consumers are hesitant
to ask pharmacists for guidance on taking over-the-counter drugs, and the new rules would
help make sure they take the medications properly.
The idea for the new labels evolved from efforts to standardize nutrition labels on
food, Shalala said.
The effort was the latest in "quality of life" themes,
such as easing traffic jams and curbing pollution, that Gore has emphasized this week and
will likely characterize his presidential campaign.
(Marijuananews note: Quality of life? What about not arresting sick people for using
something safer than these other drugs?
If people can be trusted to take drugs that can kill them, then why can't they be trusted
to take one that cannot.)