Panic In Prohibition Park:
How Maintaining The Party Line For The Cadres Alienates The Public.
Analysis By Richard Cowan
October 15, 1999The anti-prohibitionist statements by New Mexico
Governor Gary Johnson have drawn a much greater reaction than one might have expected.
After all, Johnson is a lame-duck from a small state. So what if he thinks that
prohibition is a failure? Far more distinguished Americans have said the same thing.
Indeed, they have generally said it better.
In fact, the greatest value in Johnsons remarks may prove to be the
prohibitionists response. They have not only gotten his views more media coverage
than they would have received if they had been ignored, but they have also made it
painfully obvious to anyone with any doubts about prohibition that the prohibitionists are
intellectually and morally bankrupt.
See
The Disintegration of
Marijuana Prohibition. Analysis By Richard Cowan
There is the old saying that it is better to remain silent and have people think that you
are a fool than to speak up and have everyone know that you are. This is what has been
happening with the Drug Czars response to Johnson.
See
When the Czar Was At
West Point He Lived Under The Honor Code;
What Happened? An American Tragedy.
Anti-prohibitionist columnist Joanne Jacobs noted, "McCaffrey
also told Rotarians in Albuquerque that the state's schoolchildren call their governor
"Puff Daddy Johnson.''
If that's true, New Mexico schoolchildren must be remarkably
well-versed on current events -- and the White House drug office must have agents in
Southwest schoolyards."
In New Mexico the Czar also lied about the Netherlands as he regularly does
with the result that a television station wants to investigate what is really
happening in Holland.
An Albuquerque paper that is obviously no fan of Johnsons gave both the Governor
and the Czar failing marks on their performances.
See
Albuquerque Journal
Editorial Criticizes Both Johnson and the Czar;
A Net Loss For Prohibitionism.
In fact, only a prohibitionist true believer could take the Czars statements
seriously. Anyone who takes the time to investigate what he is saying will find out that
he is lying. Heretofore, he has gotten a free ride from the media, most notably on his
lies about the Netherlands, but about medical marijuana as well.
See
Washington Post and
New York Times on IOM Medical Marijuana
Compare and Contrast A Split In The Establishment?
The Drug Czars Quote In The Post Wins The Prize.
and
The Drug Czars
Testimony On "The Drug Legalization Movement In America" Has Three Parts:
Lie About The Anti-Prohibitionist Movement; Lie About Marijuana; Lie About The
Netherlands.
With A Little Lying About Me.
That may be coming to an end, in part because of the inept and heavy-handed response to
Johnson. So why is he doing this?
I think that the answer is that prohibitionism particularly the "reefer
madness" about marijuana that is necessary to maintain marijuana prohibition
has become the driving ideology for DEAlands law enforcement establishment. In order
to maintain discipline within the ranks many of whom know that marijuana
prohibition is a fraud it is necessary to respond immediately and as harshly as
possible.
See
From The Drug Czars 8-Year
Plan to the Republicans Drug-Free Century Act,
The Prohibitionist Agenda Is War Without End. Orwell Would Understand.
Analysis By Richard Cowan
This is a condition similar to that in China where any dissent panics the governing
Communist Party. They have long since abandoned Communism in practice, but insist on
adherence to the ideology so as to maintain the discipline of the Party cadres. If they
allow deviation from the Party Line the Party will lose power.
This is hardly new. When the failure of Communism became obvious in Russia under
Stalin, anyone who showed any awareness of the problems was denounced as a
"wrecker." Stalin simply liquidated everyone who knew what they were doing.
In DEAland, the villains are "legalizers," and adherence to an absurd
ideology is a condition for advancement in law enforcement. This has the effect of either
silencing or driving out any independent thinkers. This closed system then feeds the
political establishment with candidates who are loyal to prohibitionism above all else.
See
How Marijuana
Prohibition Corrupts All Of Our Institutions
Medicine, Law Enforcement, Journalism
And How That Corruption Sustains Prohibitionism
Thus any problems under prohibition must be portrayed not as the fault of
either prohibition or the prohibitionists, but rather as that of the critics, all of
whom are called "legalizers" -- even if they only want very limited and
controlled access to medical marijuana. This is a global characteristic of prohibitionism,
an international ideology.
See
UK Drug
Tsar Blames Cannabis Campaign As Heroin Floods Market;
Marijuana Seizures 15 Times That of Hard Drugs
If anyone criticizes any aspect of prohibition, except to say that we need more of the
same, they are called "pro-drug" as the Czar so scurrilously labeled
Johnsons comments. They are also accused of undermining "law enforcement."
See the amazingly intemperate response of New Mexican police:
Law Enforcement
Reaction To Johnsons Criticism:
"That is such an irresponsible position that I think the idiot should resign,"
says New Mexico Sheriff.
And It is Bad For Their Morale
The response to Governor Johnson has nothing to do with reducing substance abuse. It is
about maintaining marijuana prohibition as the center piece of the prohibitionist
ideology. It is disintegrating and the buffoonery necessary to maintain it with the cadres
simultaneously undermines it with the public.
Perhaps the best analysis was offered by Stephen Young in a letter to a prohibitionist
Canadian paper:
"Question how many drug warriors does it take to
change a lightbulb?
Answernobodys quite sure, but they are going to need a lot more money and
complete allegiance from the public to do the job right."
See
How Many
Drug Warriors Does It Take To Change A Light Bulb?