(Ed. note: The Citizen is taking no
prisoners. They are absolutely committed to ending prohibition. There are several other
Canadian papers that seem to be almost as determined.)
From the Ottawa Citizen
June 29, 1998
letters@thecitizen.southam.cahttp://www.ottawacitizen.com/
GONZO DRUG CZAR
If the world-wide war on drugs has a commander-in-chief, it is President Bill
Clintons "Drug Czar," retired general Barry McCaffrey.
Those who still support the failed policy of drug prohibition should note the latest
musings of their leader.
Testifying before a U.S. Senate committee, Gen. McCaffrey sounded
as if he were auditioning for a part on the X-Files when he claimed, "There is a
carefully camouflaged, exorbitantly funded, well-heeled, elitist group whose ultimate goal
is to legalize drug use in the United States."
The generals comments followed the publication the previous week of a two-page
newspaper ad calling for an end to the war on drugs. The letter was signed by more than
500 prominent individuals from around the world, and included subversives like George
Shultz, Ronald Reagans Secretary of State, former UN Secretary General Javier Perez
de Cuellar, Nobel-laureate Milton Friedman, and journalist Walter Cronkite. The
generals Senate audience knew exactly what and whom he was getting at.
Was this petition "carefully camouflaged"? It was organizedquite openly
-- by the Lindesmith Center. That this American institute is funded by billionaire
financier George Soros is well-known. And Mr. Soros is hardly a shadowy character: His
philanthropic efforts, including assistance for former communist countries making the
transition to freedom, have been impressive. He deserves better than the generals
innuendo.
What about the claim that the legalization movement is
"exorbitantly funded"? Exorbitant is a relative thing. The United States spends
$30 billion a year on its drug war and accompanying propaganda. Relative to that $30
billion, its funding is insignificant.
As for the charge of elitism, that is an example of the worst sort of political
rabble-rousing, a cheap shot not worth comment.
But the drug-warrior-in-chief wasnt done. He went on to tell the Senate that drug
reformers had, "Through a slick misinformation campaign, E [perpetrated] a fraud on
the American people, a fraud so devious that even some of the nations most respected
newspapers and sophisticated media are capable of echoing their falsehoods."
In other words, its inconceivable that journalists could look at the facts and
reasonably come to a conclusion different than the generals. Every
publication that disapproves of drug prohibitionamong them National Review, The
Economist, and yes, this newspaperhas simply been duped by the conspiracy.
General McCaffreys bitter, paranoid attacks, coming as they did hard upon the UN
conference on drugs and the debate about drug prohibition that it prompted, exposed just
how empty the drug warriors case really is.
Bereft of evidence, belied by experience, drug prohibitionists have few rational
arguments to makeso they insult, vilify, and denounce.
Its an old rule in politics: When the facts are against you, throw mud in their
eyes.
Copyright 1998 The Ottawa Citizen