By Spider Robinson

January 11, 1999

CHASING ANDY SIPOWICZ

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? In the vernacular it means, "Who will police the cops?" It has been a good question for a long time, as evidenced by the fact that it’s proverbial in Latin. The Romans were probably paraphrasing earlier epigrams in Hyksos. There may even be an expression for it in Great Ape.

Humans are inherently disorderly, yet crave order—every blessed one of us wants to be the ONLY one allowed to break taboos. The only solution ever found is to separate out the biggest, meanest mothas, give them the best weapons and the exclusive right to commit deadly violence, and let them enforce whatever taboos the old men and women can dream up. What prevents them from running wild? Innate moral integrity. . . plus the fear that OTHER big men with weapons will come for them if they do.

And they will, if the king has half a brain. Nothing—nothing—can more quickly or surely shatter a social contract than the general realization that the police have gone rogue. Any hope of a civilized society immediately becomes a doomed joke.

See
How Marijuana Prohibition Corrupts All Of Our Institutions
– Medicine, Law Enforcement, Journalism
And How That Corruption Sustains Prohibitionism

So we have to have cop-cops. But, oddly, we don’t want them to be too good at it. An entire generation of movies, TV shows and novels about cops, a relentless onslaught of propaganda, has persuaded us that the folks in Internal Affairs are the VILLAINS: the handicap the noble hero must bear in his struggle with Evil. Internal Affairs officers are always depicted as heartless swine who live to destroy a good cop’s career, just because he committed some trivial technical mistake while Doin’ What He Hadda Do. "The Rat Squad," they’re generally called. Nothing could be lower than a cop who would look to hurt another cop (merely because he disgraces the badge), right? Ask any cop.

Can there be any clearer proof that deep down, most cops think of themselves as at least potential criminals?

Requiring cops to adhere to the laws they enforce hobbles them, we’re told. After all, the other side gets to cheat. Andy Sipowicz on NYPD Blue has been perhaps the most eloquent exponent (at least since Clint Eastwood quit playing Dirty Harry) of the proposition that sometimes an officer just has to "tune up" a suspect—that is, beat a confession out of him, or kill him.

Ah, "but only when you know you’re right." That’s who I want arbitrating the complex moral dichotomies of our time, someone sure to be infallible: an ill-educated overweight civil servant with a jaundiced world-view and a 9 millimetre.

In Abbotsford, B.C., a band of these secular popes recently surrounded a house where they had reason to believe marijuana existed. Naturally they were armed to the teeth and keyed up; everyone knows pot-sellers love a shootout with overwhelming forces. This house, which they had under surveillance for two hours, had a gigantic banner in the front window reading, "HAPPY BIRTHDAY," and was surrounded by children playing street hockey, who all cheered and went inside when a grownup yelled, "Cake and presents!" Imagine the astonishment of the officers when, kicking the door in and brandishing cocked firearms, they found a birthday in progress and the house full of children.

It must have been during those two seconds it would have taken a reasonably considerate fool to safety and holster his weapon that they received their second stunning surprise: The dog they knew was there WAS THERE. The one they’d had to pepper-spray the last time they’d busted this suspect in this house, five weeks earlier. Who could have expected such a thing?

Furthermore, the dog had apparently spent the time practising transcendental meditation, for he now evinced an ability to levitate and, it says here, "bit one of the officers on the upper arm." (He was also a disguise expert. Although the police swear he was a "pit bull," his photo looks nothing whatever like one—even his owner was fooled.)

But much had changed in those five weeks. Pepper spray was now out of the question, even for a dog, so the officer’s partner did what his bosses maintain was the correct, reasonable thing: He blew the dog away.

Say that again: A policeman popped two caps in a room full of children to save his partner from the bite of a flying dog, and his superiors have no problem with that.

They refuse to say what kind of gun was used, so one must presume it was non-reg, a hand-cannon. Children as young as six months were spattered with blood. So were their parents. As I write this, the TV news just reported that the police response to their loud complaints has been to arrest one for assaulting an officer (if true, good man!) and criticize the rest for allowing their kids to attend a party at a "drug house."

One sees the sad truth of this: They should indeed have known that smoking pot is an activity known to attract trigger-happy idiots. It was in this part of the world, only a few years ago, that a boy was shot dead for making the fatal mistake of having a TV remote in his hand when officers kicked HIS door in. They were looking for a pot- dealer who’d once lived in another part of the building.

Nor has British Columbia a monopoly on this sort of thing. In Sunderland, Ont., a foolish young man utters a threat against a cop. A few weeks later, the officer and three other cops decide to discuss it with him at his home at 8 p.m. They end up gut-shooting his father and kid brother. One cop has a black eye, another "barely escaped death when a bullet passed centimetres from his nose," even though there is no indication any of the civilians had guns. The cops don’t want to talk about it; there’s a publication ban.

The hell with Andy Sipowicz and Dirty Harry! I want MORE Internal-Affairs-type cops, with bigger budgets and broader powers. What a good policeman does is a holy chore, and the power he is given is sacred: He MUST be worthy of it. Otherwise good people start to fear the cops more than the crooks. . . and then the Crazy Years come.
(Marijuananews note: Oh Canada! They came to DEAland long ago.
Without the Internet we would never know about this, so give your computer a big wet kiss. Go ahead. No one is looking. This is why we are going to win.)