New Zealand
Delegate To UN Special Session
Has Spoken In Favour Of Cannabis Law Reform, David Hadorn Reports
June 5, 1998
Otago Daily-Times
Dunedin, NZ
odt.editor@alliedpress.co.nz By David
Hadorn
(Note from Hadorn: This same editorial is set to appear in the NZ Herald (Auckland) info@herald.co.nz and Evening Post (Wellington) editor@evpost.co.nz & http://www.evpost.co.nz/ on June 8. These three
newspapers published editorials critical of the Drug Policy Forums recent final
report.)
See
A Major Contribution --
Regulate And Tax Cannabis -
Full Text of New Zealand Drug Policy Forum Final Report
and
New Zealand
Government Rejects Recommendation To Legalize Cannabis Pending Further Research
UN CHANCE TO REFORM CANNABIS LAWS
[Daily Times preamble: Dr David Hadorn, director of the Drug Policy Forum Trust,
headquartered in Wellington, believes an opportunity for New Zealand to promote rational
cannabis policies will occur in the United Nations next week. In this article he explains
why. His essay is also a response to our most recent editorial on the subject (ODT 4.4.98)
against the trusts recommendations.]
Two months have passed since the Drug Policy Forum Trust, a group of physicians and other
professionals, recommended that cannabis be accepted as part of contemporary New Zealand
culture and treated like tobacco and alcohol, through a system of regulation and taxation.
Adopting this approach to cannabis control would:
- dismantle the lucrative cannabis black market;
- improve the effectiveness of drug education and treatment programmes;
- save a tremendous amount of money.
The response to our report has been generally positive. Many New Zealanders, it seems,
are ready for a change. Others have raised objections, of which the following are the most
common:
- Cannabis is harmful, so it should remain illegal (to protect the children). .
- We already have enough trouble with alcohol and tobacco; we do not need a third (legal)
drug.
- Removing criminal penalties from cannabis would cause an increase in drug-related
problems.
None of these arguments is supported by available evidence.
Yes, cannabis can be harmful, especially to troubled teenagers, whose compulsive
over-use of cannabis can cause a variety of problems, but making criminals of these kids
does nothing to help the situation, and indeed makes matters worse. It is worth
reinforcing this point. We do not deny that cannabis causes harm, but dozens of scientific
studies have shown that prohibition policies magnify the harms of cannabis. What we are saying, then, is "heres how to minimise the
harm". When prohibition advocates reply, "but cannabis is harmful", they
simply are not listening.
See
Is marijuana really
harmless, like everyone has been saying?
Regarding the "two drugs are quite enough" argumentisnt it
obvious that we already have all three drugs? Cannabis is ubiquitous and indeed has long
been an established part of New Zealand society. The question at issue is: does it make
sense to treat two of these drugs as legal and one as illegal? The answer, we believe, is
"no".
See
"Two Drugs Are
Quite Enough" NZ Editorial;
Saying Marijuana Is "No Worse Than Alcohol and Tobacco" Won't Work
Finally, the claim that a regulated cannabis market would increase drug-related
problems, such as addiction or harmful public health impacts, is completely unsupported by
overseas experience. Wherever cannabis laws have been liberalised, as in The Netherlands
and several states in Australia and the US, neither drug use nor drug-related harms have
increased. In The Netherlands, for example, the rate of both cannabis and hard drug use by
teenagers is among the lowest in Europeand much lower than in the prohibitionist
United States.
See
Go Dutch!
Unfortunately, those who make claims such as these are very seldom (if ever) required
to support those claims with actual evidence. Were they required to do so, for example, by
news reporters, the lack of a solid scientific foundation for cannabis prohibition would
become readily apparent.
Cannabis prohibition is an even more serious problem when viewed from a global
perspective. Entire governments in Latin America and elsewhere have been subverted and
corrupted by the hundreds of billions of dollars pumped into the international criminal
underground by the war on drugs, most of which is focused on cannabis. Meanwhile, drugs of
all kinds are cheaper and more available than ever.
Leadership on international drug policy is badly needed. Given its reputation for
pragmatism and its tradition of serving as a social laboratory, New Zealand could
potentially provide such leadership. A rare and important opportunity to move in this
direction will occur next week in New York, when the United Nations General Assembly
convenes a special session on drugs. Although the UN organisers are attempting to restrict
the focus of this session to "how to fight the drug war more effectively," a
strong groundswell is building to expand the discussion to include potential alternative
approaches to drug policy.
See
Dutch Scholar
Takes Very Critical Look At Coming UN Meeting With Its Slogan "A drug free world - We
can do it!"
New Zealand might be part of this vital rearguard action. Our delegate to the UN
special session is Tuariki John Delamere, Associate Minister of Health and Minister of
Customs. Mr Delamere has in the past spoken out in favour of cannabis law reform. If he is
able to speak his conscience in New York, New Zealand might very well put a cat among the
pigeons.
Concurrent with the UN special session, dozens of major public events will be held
around the world to marshal support for more compassionate and effective drug control
policies. In New Zealand, such events will be held in Auckland,
Wellington, Christchurch, and Dunedin. By attending these events, the people of New
Zealand can "send a message" to our politicians and to the international
community. As such, these events are analogous to the anti-nuclear, anti-Vietnam War, and
anti-apartheid protests held in years gone by.
New Zealand society is almost certainly matured to the point that we are quite capable
of managing a regulated cannabis market. Moreover, by leading both by example and
exhortation we can help the world find its way out of the blind alley of cannabis
prohibition.
The upcoming UN special session and surrounding activities will bear close watching.