Judge Releases Kubbys On Own Recognizance.
Libertarian Party Organizations Now Committed To The Marijuana Issue.
Large Number Of Plants Will Force Dealing With Difficult Questions --
Analysis By Richard Cowan

January 22, 1999

The Kubby case is – at the very least – going to be very interesting.

The absurd behavior of the police and prosecutors in arresting Steve and Michelle Kubby is already backfiring.

Sending 12 armed police into the home of a nationally known medical marijuana user and political activist was dumb enough.

They compounded the damage by arresting them and holding them overnight under inhumane conditions, and asking that bail be set at $100,000 each for two non-violent persons who pose zero flight risk. As Kubby’s attorney pointed out, this is more bail than is commonly required for violent criminals.
See
Elderly Oregon Medical Marijuana User More Severely Punished Than Child Molester

The judge obviously wasn’t buying it, and now the Kubbys have been released without bail.

First, it should be noted that the behavior of the police in this case was hardly exceptional. The Feds sent a similar army to arrest Peter McWilliams, and even to pick up Todd McCormick on a bail revocation.
See
Buckley Deplores The Mistreatment of McWilliams By The Feds
and
How the Government Helps Medical Marijuana Patients:
"McWilliams vomited repeatedly in court Friday, prompting guards to keep a trash can nearby."

People in wheelchairs are sometimes held at gunpoint, as though they might run over the police. This sort of thing happens even in relatively civilized Canada.
See
Canadian Police March AIDS Patient, Wife and Child from House With Hands Over Their Heads;
Destroy Medical Marijuana Plants

Excessive bail – that would seem to violate the 8th Amendment -- is often demanded. Peter McWilliams was held on $250,000, even though he posed no flight risk. The prosecutors usually prevail.
See
Todd McCormick Remains Free On $500,000 Bond; Hearing Scheduled For December 14
and
Peter McWilliams Still Held on $250,000 Bond; Denied AIDS Medication For Four Days!!! Two Stories

McCormick was subjected to even worse mistreatment, although he was held in a Federal facility, which are usually better than county jails.

See
Forced to Walk Barefoot Through Sewage, Denied Even A Pillow, Cancer Patient Todd McCormick
In Such Fragile Condition, He Is Transferred To The Psychiatric Ward Where He Is Kept In Cold Cell

There are two things that are going to make the Kubby case a real test for a lot of people.

First, the alleged number of plants – over 300 -- was far larger than what most people would consider necessary. After all, former AG Lungren wanted to restrict patients to only two plants or one ounce , an amount he said should be enough for 30 days. Or perhaps it was just pictures of two plants.

On the other hand, the Oakland city regulations allow patients to have 30 outdoor marijuana plants, 48 indoor plants or 1.5 pounds of bulk marijuana. By this measure the Kubby’s should have had only 96 plants.
See
Oakland City Council Votes To Allow Patients One And Half Pounds Of Medical Marijuana

In fact, there is no set amount that can be said to be appropriate for all patients.

One ounce might last some people for months. For others, just a few days. Also, the THC potency of the plants can vary greatly. The problem is that there are simply too many variables for an arbitrary limit.

Also, Kubby, like McCormick, is something of an expert on the plant, and might reasonably want to do botanical research. And why not? Inasmuch as the DEAland government is not doing any such research, it is perfectly reasonable for someone like Kubby and McCormick, who have to grow their own medicine, to want to experiment.

It might seem reasonable for the either the federal or state government to set limits on how many plants someone could have, if the governments were acting in good faith to see that patients get the best medicine possible, as soon as they need it. In fact, they are doing just the opposite.

Nonetheless, the quantity will be the key issue. If there had been only a few plants, then the case would probably just be dismissed.

Meanwhile back in the real world, the narcs don’t want anyone to have medical marijuana. Period. And the Libertarians and the broader marijuana reform movement think that it should be legal. Period.

The Libertarian Party – at both the state and national level have now issued press releases supporting the Kubbys and denouncing their arrest. They are now committed to taking action to support an individual, and not just a broad principle. This is not to say that they have not been dedicated to the issue before now.
See
California Libertarian Party Pays For Press Release Saying McWilliams’Arrest Is A "Wake-Up Call to Californians"
However, there is an old joke about the difference between "dedicated" and "committed" that may be relevant to the present situation.

When you have bacon and eggs, the chicken in dedicated, but the pig is committed. Now the Libertarians have to go whole hog. 

Even those who are not Libertarians should recognize that the libertarians play an important role in the American political process as persistent, consistent, and usually disinterested, critics of government programs.

I call myself a libertarian, but it is probably not surprising that I think that the Libertarians have paid too little attention to the marijuana issue. (No one pays enough attention to the marijuana issue!!)

I think that there are essentially two reasons for this neglect. First, libertarians generally take the broad philosophical view that all drugs should be legal, so it is not necessary – or even appropriate -- to focus on marijuana or any single drug. I have argued otherwise, and many individual libertarians may agree with me.
See
Why Marijuana? Why Is There a Separate Marijuana Reform Movement?
Why Isn’t Just Preaching Freedom Enough?

Nonetheless, minimizing government in general is the essence of libertarianism.

The other reason is that libertarians have the same limitations and inhibitions as everyone else. The great thing about the Libertarian philosophy is that you don’t have to be an expert on marijuana – or on anything else.

Almost all libertarians are "philosophically" opposed to the marijuana laws – of course – just as they are "philosophically" opposed to laws on private adult sexual behavior. But why do we have to talk about that kind of stuff? Let’s talk about taxes, in stead. And guns! Yeah, let’s talk about guns.

In short, people like to talk about those of their freedoms that they care most about. But Kubby has forced the issue. The Libertarians have to support their own, and it doesn’t matter to them if he had three, or three hundred or three thousand plants. He should have that right.

On the other hand the "pure" medical marijuana people may find the Kubby case embarrassing, because of both the quantity -- and the libertarian argument for full legalization.

One of the great follies of the various segments of the cannabis reform movements is the perceived necessity to separate their "pure" segment, hemp, medical marijuana, or whatever, from NORML and/or the marijuana reform movement, etc.
See
Is The Hemp Leaf Just A Fig Leaf For Marijuana? Uneasy Relationships in the Cannabis Movements
and
Wisconsin Legislator Wants To Legalize Hemp; Fears Support Of Marijuana Reform Advocates;
Attorney General Is Opposed; Narks Claim Local Weed Is 25% THC!

The fact is that there is nothing that they can say or do that will appease the prohibitionists or get the DEA to stop lying and claiming that they are just "front for NORML." If the lying stops, the system will collapse.

Arresting sick people for using a plant that has not been approved by Washington bureaucrats is wrong. It does not become right because the person has a certain number of plants.

However, arresting healthy people for using a plant that has not been approved by different Washington bureaucrats is also wrong. It does not become right because sick people have a special need for the plant.

There is a difference between the needs of the sick and healthy, but neither is the property of the government.

The fact is that the government cannot and will not provide realistic access to medical marijuana, and only the recognition of the rights of the people will suffice. It is not about legalizing marijuana; it is about legalizing freedom.
See
The Nation Magazine Quotes Dr. Lester Grinspoon Explaining
Why He Thinks Only Full Legalization Will Allow Proper Access to Medical Marijuana

The fact that the government will not – cannot – stop lying about marijuana means that even the libertarians are going to have to learn the truth about marijuana. But libertarians have nothing to fear from the truth.

That will be the ultimate outcome of the Kubby case -- and whatever comes next.

See