May 12, 1998From the Daily Hampshire Gazette
Northampton, Mass.
letters@gazettenet.com
http://www.gazettenet.com
By William C. Newman, Esq.
IS GATEWAY DRUG THEORY VALID?
Gateway drugs? Weve been hearing a lot about them recently. The gateway drug
theory used to be called the stepping-stone hypothesis. It postulates that use of one drug
leads to use of other more addictive and dangerous ones. Marijuana to heroin is the usual
example. As former Northampton Police Officer, now an FBI agent,
Tommy OConnor said on this page last month, "I have never dealt with a young
person whose drug use began with heroin."
And Im sure thats true. Indeed, the Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse
at Columbia University confirms that most heroin and crack addicts have smoked marijuana.
But hold on just a minute. The fact that one event preceded another does not
necessarily mean that the first caused the second.
Most heroin and crack addicts also drank Coca-Cola and ate Oreos. The first substance
they ingested was mothers milk. Or formula. What does any of this prove? Not much.
Which is precisely the point.
Although the gateway theory intuitively makes some sense, in this case, intuition may
mislead us. Drs. Lynn Zimmer and John P. Morgan explain in their recent book, Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts, A Review of the
Scientific Evidence, that the gateway theory does not
describe cause and effect. Rather, it demonstrates a statistical relationship between a
relatively common occurrence - smoking marijuana, which 72 million Americans have done -
and an uncommon behavior - use of dangerously addictive drugs.
Most marijuana users, according to Zimmer and Morgan, never use any other illegal drug.
The statistics they cite show that less than one percent of people who try marijuana
become regular users of cocaine or heroin. Zimmer and Morgan illustrate their point with
an analogy. Most motorcyclists rode bicycles, but it does not follow, they say, that
"bicycle riding causes motorcycle riding." Nor would we expect "an increase
in the former to lead automatically to an increase in the latter." If you wanted to
cut down on motorcycle traffic, would you prohibit bicycles?
This is not to imply that drug use - particularly among teenagers - doesnt
presage problems. It does. But the gateway theory, as a basis for understanding drug
abuse, provides a limited and often erroneous paradigm. The scientific studies show that
adult drug abusers, as adolescents, used a lot of drugs. They used the readily available
legal ones - caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol. Many of them smoked marijuana and also
swallowed stimulants or sedatives.
Some raided an adults medicine cabinet for pain killers, sleeping medications, or
diet pills. Others discovered steroids while training for a sport, speed while studying
for exams, and codeine in cough suppressants while suffering through a cold.
A significant number inhaled glue vapors or helium from party balloons and experimented
with psychedelics. They stuck God-knows-what-else up their noses, down their throats, or
into their veins.
For psychological or physiological reasons they couldnt stop using heroin or
cocaine or alcohol. They became addicts.
Adults disdain and warn kids about alcoholism and drug abuse. But 80 percent of adults
in America drink some alcohol.
Alcohol is a drug. Kids know that. Some kids, no matter what we say, are going to try
some drugs, too.
Way too many, in fact. And way too early. Fifty-four percent of eighth-graders in
America have used alcohol, and one in 12 gets drunk at least once a month.
Gateway theorists have at least this much right - anyone, especially a kid, using a lot
of drugs is swimming in troubled waters. A recent government study reports that adolescent
drug users often commit delinquent acts, exhibit eating disorders, and carry within
themselves various psychological problems. No parent wants his or her kids to get involved
with drugs, including alcohol. Drugs surely cant do a kid any good.
Most drugs, including alcohol for minors, are illegal. That reality, in and of itself,
poses dangers. Kids learn their way around a criminal subculture. They may end up in jail.
Worse yet, drugs can kill. If the alcohol poisoning doesnt prove fatal, the car
crash could. If the heroin doesnt kill the kid, the shared needle might. Some adults fear that if we draw distinctions among drugs, we may tempt
kids to try the not-as-inherently dangerous ones, the so-called gateway drugs. So we,
being well-intentioned, lump drugs together and condemn them all equally. That is a
mistake. Our apprehension about drugs should not blind us to the differences in their
legality, effect, and addictive potential. Some kids, despite our lessons, will experiment
with cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana. Indoctrinating those kids with the notion that
theres no difference between alcohol and heroin, marijuana and cocaine perpetrates a
lie that is anything but benign. A kid who believes that misinformation easily could pass
through the gateway to drug dependence and head down a pathway towards death.