"If you say it's okay for
D.C. to legalize marijuana, then what's next?
Legalizing cocaine? Or heroin? Or perhaps rape and murder?"
-- The Appalling People Who Govern Us Continue To Block Medical Marijuana In DC.
See
Barr Trying Again to
Silence DCs Medical Marijuana Vote
Bill Coming to House Floor Tomorrow DRCNet Alert
and
Meanwhile Back In Limbo
(Thats The Capital of DEAland):
Medical Marijuana Initiative Results Still Unknown. A Really, Really
Secret Ballot.
From The Washington Post
www.washingtonpost.com
House Puts Strings on D.C. Budget
Republicans Target Social Issues in Approving Spending Plan By Stephen C. Fehr
Washington Post Staff Writer
September 10, 1999
A partisan fight over adoption of the D.C. budget escalated last night as the
Republican-led House narrowly approved social and health mandates on the District while
endorsing the city's $4.7 billion budget and tax cuts.
The largely party-line vote was 208 to 206 in support of the mandates and spending
plan.
Rep. Constance A. Morella (R-Md.) was one of eight Republicans who joined the Democrats
in opposing the measure. Other Washington area lawmakers voted with their respective
parties.
Among other things, the so-called social riders attached to the
bill would prohibit the city from legalizing marijuana for medicinal purposes and
from supplying free, clean needles to drug addicts.
One measure would stop spending of city money on most abortions. Another rider would
ban city spending on health benefits for unmarried domestic partners. The legislation also
would allow Bell Atlantic Mobile to build two cellular telephone towers in Rock Creek
Park.
Clinton administration officials said last night that if the legislation, which could
be considered by the Senate as early as next week, comes to the president with the riders
attached, Clinton will be advised to veto it.
"This bill contains numerous provisions that would essentially trample on the
ability of the District of Columbia to conduct its business in a way consistent with home
rule. Therefore, we oppose it," said Linda Ricci, spokeswoman for the White House
budget office.
See
Even The
Prohibitionist Wall Street Journal Notes The Irony
Of Clintons Alliance With Barr Against Medical Marijuana In D.C.
Lawmakers defended the drug restrictions as necessary to prevent
the District from returning to what Rep. Ernest J. Istook Jr. (R-Okla.) called "the
worst of the Marion Barry days, when the loose attitude toward illegal drugs made the city
the butt of late-night talk show jokes."
Istook, chairman of the Appropriations Committee subcommittee on the District, accused
Rep. James P. Moran (D-Va.), who led the opposition, of promoting a "pro-drug
agenda."
"Where do you draw the line?" Istook asked. "If you say it's okay for
D.C. to legalize marijuana, then what's next? Legalizing cocaine? Or heroin? Or perhaps
rape and murder?"
(Marijuananews note: Never mind that the bill does not "legalize marijuana"
-- it is appalling that Istook does not know the difference between a sick person using
medical marijuana and someone committing rape. The difference is very simple. In Oklahoma,
medical marijuana users are more harshly punished than rapists! Now talk to us about
"sending the wrong message to children.")
See
A Reader Asks His
Congressman About Will Foster
Who Will Be In Prison Four Times Longer Than Rapists
The Local Media Doesnt Care -- What One Person Can Do
Moran and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) said the sole issue was whether the
District would be able to decide how to spend its money.
(Marijuananews note: So long as no one is willing to confront the
substantive issues regarding medical marijuana and the rights of individuals, then the
Republicans can escape addressing the real issues that affect the whole country, not just
DC.)
"We would not impose these kind of restrictions on any of our local governments
that are being imposed on the District of Columbia," Moran said.
Norton added, "The District should not be asked to grovel to get its own
money."
The vote was difficult for Democratic lawmakers torn between supporting many of the
provisions in the spending plan and defending the District's right to govern itself. Rep.
Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.) asked his Democratic colleagues to put aside the
congressionally imposed mandates and consider the bill's benefits.
Excerpted
© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company