HHS Announcement On New
Medical Marijuana Research Rules
Shows It Is The Same Old Game.
See
Federal
Government Appears To Ease Access To Marijuana For Medical Testing.
At Least That Is What They Say They Will Do, But It Is "not a reversal of
policy." 2 Articles
and
Americans For
Medical Rights Issues Press Release Praising New NIH Policy
That Will Supposedly Make Marijuana Available For Research On Its Medical Use:
"Feds Begin to Bend on Medical Marijuana."
and
Column By
Authors of the IOM Report On Medical Marijuana
Shows Why The Public Does Not Trust The Medical Establishment
And Why They Should Not! With Analysis by Richard Cowan
and links(Marijuananews note:
It is important to understand that while this is an important tactical retreat by the
prohibitionists, it is simply a new stage of the war by other means.
What this HHS announcement really says is that anyone wanting to do research on medical
marijuana should also be prepared to do research on the games that the prohibitionists
play.
First, HHS has no intention of allowing any research with the objective of helping
patients. It explicitly rejects any single patient programs that would provide marijuana
to individuals in great need.
Second, the initial tests will be restricted to establishing "safety."
Third, the only approved use of the marijuana provided for research will be to find a
non-smoking way to provide the cannabinoid constituents about which establishment medicine
knows very little.
In any case, there is no way to do what they are proposing, and it would be unethical
even to try.
This is not to say that it is going to be as easy for the prohibitionists to get away
with stalling as in the past, especially when state and local governments are applying to
do research.
However, these new regulations dont go into effect until December 1st,
then it will be time for the holidays and then it will take time to evaluate the proposals
and then they will have to plant the marijuana -- and harvest it -- and think about it,
and so it will be late next year before anything can be done, at the earliest.
In short, this is impossible, unethical and dangerous to individual freedom and to the
public health. This is marijuana prohibition.)
ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GUIDANCE ON
PROCEDURES FOR THE PROVISION OF MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
http://www.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not99-091.html
Release Date:
May 21, 1999
National Institutes of Health
I. Introduction
The intent of this document is to provide guidance to the biomedical research community
who intend to study marijuana in scientifically valid investigations and well-controlled
clinical trials on the procedures of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for
providing research-grade marijuana to sponsors.(i)
The production and distribution of marijuana for clinical research, is carefully
restricted under a number of federal laws and international commitments. The manufacture,
acquisition, and distribution of marijuana is subject to control under Schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
(21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the most restrictive of the five
federally regulated classes of controlled substances. Persons who wish to conduct research
using Schedule I substances such as marijuana must obtain a special registration under the
CSA from the Drug Enforcement Administration (21 U.S.C. 823(f)).
(Marijuananews note: Why they have to keep marijuana in Schedule One.)
See
How The IOM Report
Impacts The Move To Have Medical Marijuana Rescheduled
and
Gettman Rejects DEAs Effort
To Reschedule Marinol Without A Hearing,
While Leaving Marijuana In Schedule One.
and links
To receive such a registration, a researcher must first be determined by HHS to be
qualified and competent, and the proposed research must be determined by HHS to have merit
(id.). Moreover, persons who intend to study marijuana for use in
the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease are subject to the
"drug" and "new drug" provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321 et seq.).
The United States is also a party to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, an
international narcotics control treaty. Parties to the Single Convention have agreed to
limit production, distribution, and possession of cannabis and cannabis resins to
authorized medical and scientific purposes (Art. 4). In addition to
these and other controls, Articles 23 and 28 of the Single Convention provide that if a
country allows cultivation of the cannabis plant for research purposes, the country must
establish a national agency to control the cultivation and distribution of the crop.
Currently, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), a component of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), oversees the cultivation of research-grade marijuana on behalf
of the United States government.
An appropriate scientific study of a drug substance requires, among other things, that
the substance used in the research must have a consistent and predictable potency, must be
free of contamination, and must be available in sufficient amounts to support the needs of
the study. NIDA allocates resources to cultivate a grade of marijuana that is suitable for
research purposes. Recently, there has been considerable
interest in determining, through scientifically valid investigations, whether cannabinoids
can provide positive medical benefits. In February 1997, an NIH-sponsored workshop
analyzed available scientific information and concluded that "in order to evaluate
various hypotheses concerning the potential utility of marijuana in various therapeutic
areas, more and better studies would be needed."(ii) Most
recently, the Institute of Medicine issued a detailed report that supports the absolute
need for evidence-based research into the effects of using marijuana and, in particular,
the cannabinoid components of marijuana, for patients with specific disease
conditions.(iii) Moreover, recent State-level public initiatives, including referenda in
support of the medical use of marijuana, have generated additional interest in the medical
community for high quality clinical investigation and comprehensive safety and
effectiveness data.
Against this backdrop are the real concerns regarding the toxicity of smoked marijuana.
Indeed, the IOM report emphasized that smoked marijuana is a crude drug delivery system
that exposes patients to a significant number of harmful substances and that "if
there is any future for marijuana as a medicine, it lies in its isolated components, the
cannabinoids and their synthetic derivatives". As such, the IOM recommended that
clinical trials should be conducted with the goal of developing safe delivery systems.
See
Counterblaste to DEA: Fallacious
Pharmacology.
"The contention that smoking cannot possibly be an acceptable route for the
administration
of a therapeutic substance is morality dressed up as science." by Peter Webster
HHS recognizes the need for objective evaluations of the potential merits of cannabinoids
for medical uses. If a positive benefit is found, HHS also recognizes the need to
stimulate development of alternative, safer dosage forms. Through
this document, HHS is announcing procedures that are intended to facilitate the research
needed to evaluate these pending public health questions by making research-grade
marijuana available for well-designed studies on a cost-reimbursable basis.
II. Availability of Marijuana for Research Purposes
To facilitate research on the potential medical uses of cannabinoids, HHS has
determined that it will make research-grade marijuana available on a cost-reimbursable
basis, subject to the priorities and conditions described in section III, below.
HHS will also consider the extent to which a proposed study incorporates the trial
design elements outlined by the participants in the 1997 NIH Workshop.
Such studies are the most likely to yield high quality, scientifically valid data on
the safety and effectiveness of cannabinoids. The goal of this
program must be to determine whether cannabinoid components of marijuana administered
through an alternative delivery system can meet the standards enumerated under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for commercial marketing of a medical product (see e.g.,
21 U.S.C. 355). As the IOM report stated, "Therefore, the purpose of clinical trials
of smoked marijuana would not be to develop marijuana as a licensed drug, but such trials
could be a first step towards the development of rapid-onset, nonsmoked cannabinoid
delivery systems."
III. Elements for Considering Proposed Studies
The focus of HHSs program is the support of quality research for the development
of clinically meaningful data. HHS intends to make available a sufficient amount of
research-grade marijuana to support those studies that are the most likely to yield
usable, essential data. However, it should be noted that NIDAs
supply of marijuana is subject to a number of constraints associated with the cultivation
of a research-grade crop and that the supply at times may be variable.
For protocols submitted by non-NIH funded sources, institutional peer-review is
strongly recommended prior to submission to HHS. After submission, the scientific merits
of each protocol will be evaluated through a Public Health Service interdisciplinary
review process. This process will take into consideration a number of factors, including
the scientific quality of the proposed study, the quality of the organizations
peer-review process, and the objectives of the proposed research. For example:
The extent to which the protocol incorporates the elements of good clinical and
laboratory research;
The extent to which the protocol describes an adequate and
well-controlled clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of marijuana and
its constituent cannabinoids in the treatment of a serious or life threatening condition;
The extent to which the protocol describes an adequate and well-controlled clinical
study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of marijuana and its constituent
cannabinoids for a use for which there are no alternative therapies;
The extent to which the protocol describes a biopharmaceutical study designed to
support the development of a dosage form alternative to smoking;
The extent to which the protocol describes high-quality research designed to address
basic, unanswered scientific questions about the effects of marijuana and its constituent
cannabinoids or about the safety or toxicity of smoked marijuana.
In the event that supplies become limited, marijuana will be made available in the
order of priority described below.
1. Protocols that have been reviewed and funded by NIH.
2. Protocols sponsored or conducted by other governmental organizations.
3. Protocols sponsored or conducted by other sources.
The sponsor of a proposed protocol must be able to demonstrate the ability to fully
reimburse NIDAs contractor for the cost of research-grade marijuana supplied through
the completion of the study. In addition, researchers who propose to conduct
investigations in humans must be able to fulfill the Food and Drug
Administrations investigational new drug (IND) requirements and must obtain a valid
registration from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for research with Schedule I
drugs.
IV. Marijuana Trial Design Elements
A clinical study involving marijuana should include certain core elements, many of
which reflect recommendations made by the 1997 NIH Workshop. A study that incorporates the
NIH Workshop recommendations will be expected to yield useful data and therefore, will be
more likely to be eligible to receive marijuana under the HHS program. The full report can
be accessed on the Internet at http://www.nih.gov/news/medmarijuana/MedicalMarijuana.htm.
HHS will consider if additional guidelines are needed on the essential elements of
clinical trial design for medical marijuana studies.
HHS also notes that within each of the categories described in
section III, preference will be given to those protocols that are designed around specific
safety or efficacy endpoints. Protocols for open-ended or "ongoing"
trials that do not include ending dates are not likely to be eligible to receive
marijuana. In addition, proposed protocols must be determined to be acceptable under
FDAs standards for authorizing the clinical study of investigational new drugs,
which state in part:
FDAs primary objectives in reviewing an IND are, in all
phases of the investigation, to assure the safety and rights of subjects, and, in Phase 2
and 3, to help assure that the quality of the scientific evaluation of drugs is adequate
to permit an evaluation of the drugs effectiveness and safety.
See
The Harsh Reality Of
Clinical Trials
Shows Another Case of The Double Standard For Medical Marijuana.
The Context For "Research." -- 2 Articles
(Marijuananews note: This means that for the foreseeable future all of the research
will be on "safety." This is what happened to Dr. Abrams.)
Therefore, although FDAs review of Phase 1 submissions will focus on assessing
the safety of Phase 1 investigations, FDAs review of Phases 2 and 3 submissions will
also include an assessment of the scientific quality of the clinical investigations and
the likelihood that the investigations will yield data capable of meeting statutory
standards for marketing approval.
21 CFR 312.22(a).
Finally, HHS intends to direct its program toward
multi-patient clinical studies. As previously determined by the Public Health Service,
single-patient requests for marijuana raised a number of concerns including the fact that
the single-patient IND process would not produce useful scientific information and we do
not foresee that they would be supported under this program.
(Marijuananews note: This rejects the one key point of the IOM
report that might have been used to help individual patients.
From The IOM Executive Summary:
"Until a non-smoked, rapid-onset cannabinoid drug delivery system becomes available,
we acknowledge that there is no clear alternative for people suffering from chronic
conditions that might be relieved by smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS wasting.
One possible approach is to treat patients as n-of-1
clinical trials, in which patients are fully informed of their status as experimental
subjects using a harmful drug delivery system, and in which their condition is closely
monitored and documented under medical supervision, thereby increasing the knowledge base
of the risks and benefits of marijuana use under such conditions."
See
Executive
Summary Of The IOM Report, Marijuana And Medicine: Assessing The Science Base
One objective of the class action medical marijuana lawsuit is to
force the government to reopen the "n-of-1" Investigative New Drug program under
which the legal eight are given marijuana.
Also, rejecting "n-of-1" trials means that people like
Steve Kubby with rare disorders will be excluded completely. This precludes the class of
people for whom the orphan drug laws were written. There are some drugs for which the
demand is simply too small to justify the expensive research required. In this context,
medical marijuana may not be a commercial threat, but it remains an ideological
challenge.)
See
Prominent Medical
Specialist Says Steve Kubby Should Be Studied, Not Jailed;
His Case Has Major Medical Implications.
V. Procedures for Obtaining Research-Grade Marijuana
Researchers who intend to conduct clinical studies of marijuana should first make an
inquiry to NIDA to determine the availability and costs of marijuana.
Such an inquiry must address the considerations outlined in sections III and IV of this
document for establishing research priority.
Because research-grade marijuana will be provided to researchers on a cost-reimbursable
basis only, researchers also will be expected to include a plan for ensuring timely
reimbursement for all costs associated with the cultivation and delivery of the marijuana.
In addition, specific information (including full justification) should be provided as
to the number and potency of marijuana cigarettes or bulk marijuana needed, and the timing
of the intended use of the marijuana. This information must be updated annually with NIDA
in order that adequate supplies can be maintained and future needs estimated. Continued
provision of marijuana is subject to availability and to continued compliance with these
policies and procedures and with all applicable statutes and regulations.
This information and requests to NIDA concerning availability and costs should be sent
to:
Program Administrator
Drug Supply and Analytical Services
National Institute on Drug Abus
6001 Executive Blvd
Bethesda, MD 20892
If NIDA determines that marijuana is available to support the
study, NIDA will provide the researcher with authorization to reference NIDAs
marijuana Drug Master File (DMF).
If the researcher is proposing a study in humans, after obtaining the right of
reference to the DMF, the researcher must proceed through the FDA process for filing an
IND application under 21 CFR part 312. Information on the requirements for obtaining an
IND can be found on the FDA web site at http://www.fda.gov.
In addition, all researchers must obtain from DEA registration to conduct research
using a Schedule I controlled substance. Information on the requirements for obtaining a
DEA registration for research with marijuana can be obtained following the process
outlined in 21 CFR part 1301.
VI. Implementation
This procedure will apply to the provision, through NIDA, of
marijuana cigarettes (of varying THC content, including placebo), as well as bulk
marijuana.
HHS will apply this procedure beginning on December 1, 1999.
HHS will re-evaluate these procedures periodically and determine within five years whether
or not the procedures should be continued. Requests for marijuana
may be submitted prior to that time. However, shipments should not be expected before then
and definitive information regarding costs may not be available until that time.
i Once implemented, this document will represent HHSs current approach with
respect to biomedical research involving marijuana. It does not
create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind HHS or the
public. An alternative approach may be used if such an approach would satisfy all
applicable legal requirements.
ii Workshop on the Medical Utility of Marijuana: Report to the Director, National
Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health, February 19-21, 1997.
iii "Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base", Institute of
Medicine, March 17, 1999.
|