"Here, if you want
cannabis you go to a coffee shop.
In other countries if you want it you have to go to a man who might try to sell you heroin
or cocaine as well."
(Ed. note: While the stated topic is heroin, the
author recognizes that the key to the success of Dutch hard drugs policy is the separation
of the marijuana market from hard drugs, the opposite of the policy in DEAland and other
prohibitionist countries which all have higher rates of hard drug use. This article is
very informative, but it is also important that it is being run as part of a series in one
of the UKs most important papers.)
See Comparison of drug
addiction levels in various European countries.June 24. 1998
The Guardian
letters@guardian.co.uk
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
By Gary Younge
STATE-SANCTIONED DRUG SCHEME
New Ways of Treating Drug Addiction in Zurich and Amsterdam
Mattheus has a lid on things. Every morning he wakes up in a flat he has kept for
years, to a steady job and a long-term relationship. The health authorities in Zurich are
keen to make sure that he stays that way. So at 8 oclock every morning, on his way
to work, and then at six every evening on his way home, he drops off at a local clinic so
the state can provide him with heroin.
Without it Mattheus, a long-term addict, says he couldnt function. He would spend
his entire time looking for drugs or the money to buy them. With it he says he has the
"rest and a regulated lifestyle" he needs and is out of the drugs scene
altogether. The regular doses of heroin which he gets from the state, he says, even makes
him feel healthier. Within two years he hopes to be drug free.
Switzerland, a country notorious for its soporific purity, is experimenting with drugs
again. The nations largest city, Zurich, is once again at the forefront. Mattheus is
one of some 200 long-term heroin addicts in Zurich who has benefited from a national
programme of giving a small number of addicts the drugs they need to get through the day -
a scheme which has slashed crime rates and increased employment in the city among a group
which until recently had been written off.
"We still believe that a life dependent on drugs is not a good life," says
Rosann Waldvogel who is the head of the towns heroin project. "So the aim is
not to encourage dependency. But these are a very specific group of people. They have been
addicts for a long time and all other attempts to wean them off drugs have failed. We
dont just hand out heroin either. In order to get it they have to come in for other
forms of help as well. There are meetings with social workers, nutritional advice, therapy
and so on. And this helps them lead a more regular lifestyle and takes drugs off the
streets." The results have been impressive. The number of those who took part in the
scheme with permanent jobs rose from 14 per cent to 32 per cent; unemployment dropped from
44 per cent to 20 per cent; and the share of those involved in theft and drugs plummeted
from 69 per cent to 10 per cent. "It means these people dont have to steal to
get money. It gives them time to settle themselves and to get involved in other projects.
It works well for a very specific group of people," says Norbert Klossner of the
Zurich police department.
Eveline Gugger, who has been a heroin addict for 11 years and has been getting her
supplies from the state for four years, has reduced her intake by two-thirds, moved off
the streets and into a flat and got a job in the kitchen of a restaurant.
"This scheme has saved my life," she says. "As well as taking less
heroin, Ive given up cocaine and I can live a life I never lived before." The
same targeting might work in Britain. The Swiss model is partly based on the experience of
a similar project in Liverpool which produced less dramatic but encouraging results, but
was not taken up nationally. Most of the UKP4 billion of drug-related crime in Britain is
caused by about 200,000 addicts. But the project in Switzerland was a political experiment
as much as a medical one. For such a scheme to work it demands that authorities
acknowledge, as a starting point, that some people will take drugs regardless of
prevention programmes and stiff sentences - an approach increasingly adopted on the
continent.
Britain, however, has chosen to follow the American route of zero tolerance, which
blurs the lines between soft and hard drugs and treats most attempts to co-opt drug
addicts as a tacit acceptance that the war has been lost. More than 60 per cent of the
annual drugs bill is spent on law enforcement, compared with 13 per cent on treatment
programmes and 12 per cent on education.
Part of the success, says Professor Gutzwiller, the professor of preventative medicine
at the University of Zurich, has been the schemes ability to target those most in
need. "These are the people who are the sickest and in social terms the most
problematic: people with no relations outside of the drugs scene who are the most
desperate and therefore the most likely to resort to theft and prostitution."
"Its just much safer now. When you have a park full of addicts in the middle
you have no idea what will happen," said a local woman, Mrs Scheneider. "It got
so you didnt want to bring your children into town. I voted to change the law
because I thought anything must be better than what we had before and the problem is not
just going to go away." The programme also appears to have helped steer many away
from hard drugs altogether. More than half of the 1,146 people who have been involved in
the project have opted for another type of treatment. Just under 10 per cent have stopped
taking heroin to pursue a course of abstinence, according to the findings of the institute
for social and preventative medicine in Zurich. They are also less likely to die than
those following other courses of treatment.
It has also freed up resources in other drug programmes for less severely dependent
addicts. Programmes previously spent much time and energy on trying to rehabilitate users
who were never going to come off drugs through orthodox methods. "Before, you only
had the choice of prison, abstinence, or therapy, and that did not suit some people,"
says Peter Sumpf, the head of Frankental clinic, which does not give out heroin. "Now
there is an alternative we are all able to give better quality care." The last time
Zurich adopted an innovative approach to its drugs problem things did not go so well.
During the nineties the city had a policy of trying to contain open drug use in a confined
area so that it could be treated more easily and would be forced out of the underground.
The result was a disaster known throughout Europe as Needle Park: a small stretch of grass
behind the Landes-museum which attracted around 2,000 people a day to come and trade in
drugs with that number doubling at the weekend. Inside, addicts used to lie inert on the
ground, spattered with blood and strewn with needles. Outside men would wait for young
women who would prostitute themselves so that they could get their next fix. Just yards
away the police looked on, their bosses annoyed by the obvious failure of this
"political experiment." "I think a lot of people came to Zurich from abroad
during this time because it had a big open drugs scene. Needle Park got a reputation that
drew people in from countries with more repressive drugs policies," she says.
Switzerland also finds itself inconveniently poised on the end of the opium trading
route that starts in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran and passes through the Caucasus,
Albania, Romania or Hungary before arriving in a land more renowned for Emmenthal and
cuckoo clocks and making it a lucrative terminus for dealers from all over the world. Of
the 362 dealers arrested in Zurich in 1993, fewer than a third were Swiss.
Little wonder then that the latest policy, launched in 1994, proved to be
controversial. A group called Youth Without Drugs challenged the plan, preached abstinence
and gathered 100,000 signatures to put the question to a referendum. Drawing on the
failure of Needle Park which has since been cleared, renovated and returned to its former
serenity in the middle of lake Zurich - the campaigners" message was simple:
"You can"t fight drugs by giving them away free," said one leader.
But the referendum, in September of last year, delivered a crushing defeat to the
nay-sayers with 70 per cent backing the new plan. "I have been in this job 11 years
and I cannot explain why we won by so much. I was shocked. I thought maybe we would win
but not by this much. We even won in rural areas where people are more conservative and
dont have much of a drugs problem. I think people saw that it was a complicated
issue and recognised that it needed a complicated response," says Waldvogel.
The programmes do not hold the sole responsibility for this. The culture of drug
dealing has also changed over the last decade. From shady deals on ill-lit streets to
deliveries ordered by mobile phones and pager requests.
While the new policy has reduced the number of addicts coming to the city there is
little evidence yet that it has actually reduced the number of addicts in Zurich. Its
proponents say it is not supposed to: "It is part of a four-point plan, along with
therapy, prevention and repression. What it has done is closed down the open drugs scene,
made drugs less generally available and removed what was a real problem for the general
public," says Waldvogel.
Almost. An evening trip to the tramway stop where Langstrasse meets Limatplatz will
suffice to show that there are still individuals dealing openly in the streets of Zurich.
There are young men walking around in purposeful circles, stopping for quick conversations
with individuals roaming equally aimlessly and then either moving on or disappearing up an
improbable alley only to appear from the shadows again 15 minutes later and start circling
again.
But compared to the brazen nature of the bad old days, the nocturnal scenes at
Limatplatz show a marked improvement, local experts say. So marked,
in fact, that the authorities in Amsterdam - a group who have dabbled in inventive drugs
policies for so long one would have thought there was little more they could learn - are
about to follow suit.
Once again they will concentrate on long-term addicts - although not quite as long-term
as the Swiss - who have not responded to other forms of therapy. But unlike the Swiss, fashion is helping to regulate the Amsterdam drug scene all by itself.
"Young people are not interested in heroin anymore. They see it as a losers
drug for old men and one that doesnt fit in very well with the music scene. They
prefer cannabis or Ecstasy and with these two drugs addiction is not really a
problem," says Roel Kesemakers, the spokesman for Yellineck drug clinic.
Since the early eighties the number of registered heroin addicts has almost halved in
Amsterdam and every year the average age of the addicts gets older. "By keeping the
heroin addicts alive longer through methadone, a lot of the young people now have the
chance to see what they look like and they dont want to look like them," says
Von Brussels, a doctor with the Amsterdam drug department.
From the coffee shops around the city centre, most of which are filled with young
Americans, Brits and Germans enjoying a country where certain premises are legally
permitted to sell cannabis, it is clear that a form of drugs tourism still brings many
people to the city. But the days of Amsterdam acting like a magnet for the flotsam and
jetsam of the continent"s failed rehabilitation attempts have long gone. The city is
treating the lowest number of foreigners for drug related problems since 1979, said one
official.
"It is partly a sign of the failure of countries" attempts to control the
drug market," says Kesemakers. "You can get as high quality drugs elsewhere now
as you can in Amsterdam so why travel," he says.
Sit in the Fibo snackbar where the Neumarkt runs into Zedijk street and you will see
the heroin and cocaine sellers out in force. Around this area of the red light district
drugs change hands within seconds of a police patrol passing. "They know it happens,
but I think that so long as there is no trouble and people dont actually use them in
the streets then they are prepared to let it go," says one barman. "Maybe
thats better or maybe its just easier for the police. It doesnt make for
a big problem here either way. Theres no fighting, shooting
or violence and no people laying around the next morning in the street. The police are
strict about that." By providing heroin itself, the authorities in
Amsterdam, as in Zurich, hope to transform the problem into part of the solution. One more
way, officials say, to push the hard drugs pushers even further into the backstreets.