I look forward to Jon Gettman's response to this.)

See
Gettman Rejects DEA’s Effort To Reschedule Marinol Without A Hearing,
While Leaving Marijuana In Schedule One.
and
Two Days After The Medical Marijuana Initiatives
The DEA Proposes Making Marinol A Schedule III Drug!! "Like Codeine With Tylenol."
More Like Cynicism With Desperation
and links

Archive-Name: gov/us/fed/nara/fed-register/1999/jul/02/64FR35928

Posting-number: Volume 64, Issue 127, Page 35928

[Federal Register: July 2, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 127)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35928-35930]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr02jy99-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

21 CFR Parts 1308, 1312

[DEA-180F]


Schedules of Controlled Substances: Rescheduling of the Food and Drug Administration Approved Product Containing Synthetic Dronabinol -Tetrahydrocannabinol] in Sesame Oil and Encapsulated in Soft Gelatin Capsules From Schedule II to Schedule III

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a final rule of the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) transferring a drug between schedules of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811. With the issuance of this final rule, the Deputy Administrator transfers from schedule II to schedule III of the CSA the drug containing synthetic dronabinol - tetrahydrocannabinol] in sesame oil and encapsulated in soft gelatin capsules in a product approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This rule also designates this drug as a schedule III non- narcotic substance requiring an import/export permit. As a result of this rule, the regulatory controls and criminal sanctions of schedule III will be applicable to the manufacture, distribution, importation and exportation of this drug.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 2, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Sapienza, Chief, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, 202-307-7183.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Dronabinol is the United States Adopted Name (USAN) for the (-)- isomer of (trans)-tetrahydrocannabinol -THC], which is believed to be the major psychoactive component of Cannibas sativa L. (marijuana). On May 31, 1985, FDA approved for marketing the product Marinol --which contains synthetic dronabinol in sesame oil and encapsulated in soft gelatin capsules—for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy. Following this FDA approval, DEA issued a final rule on May 13, 1986, transferring FDA-approved products of the same formulation as Marinol from schedule I to schedule II of the CSA in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a). (For simplicity within this document, the term "Marinol " will be used hereafter to refer to Marinol and any other products, which may by approved by FDA in the future, that have the same formulation as Marinol .) The 1986 rescheduling of Marinol was based on a medical and scientific evaluation and scheduling recommendation from the Assistant Secretary for Health in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(b). The transfer of Marinol to schedule II did not affect the CSA classification of pure dronabinol, which—as a tetrahydrocannabinol with no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States—remains a schedule I controlled substance. On December 22, 1992, FDA expanded Marinol ’s indications to include the treatment of anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDS.

(Marijuananews note: What this means is that adding sesame oil – which has no established medical use -- to THC converts THC from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug. What would happen if it were added to other Schedule I drugs such as heroin and LSD?)

The Petition To Reschedule Marinol

On February 3, 1995, UNIMED Pharmaceuticals, Inc. petitioned the Administrator of DEA to transfer Marinolfrom schedule II to schedule III. In response to this petition, and in view of supplemental information that UNIMED provided to DEA on December 11, 1996, DEA had to determine whether this proposed rescheduling of Marinolwould comport with United States obligations under the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 (Psychotropic Convention). See 21 U.S.C. 811(d). Under the Psychotropic Convention, dronabinol and all dronabinol-containing products, such as Marinol, are listed in schedule II. As a result, the United States is obligated under the Psychotropic Convention to impose certain restrictions on the export and import of Marinol. DEA has concluded that, in order for the United States to continue to meet its obligations under the Psychotropic Convention, DEA will continue to require import and export permits for international transactions involving Marinol, even though Marinol will be transferred to schedule III of the CSA. (As set forth below, to accomplish this, DEA is hereby amending 21 CFR 1312.30 to require import and export permits for international transactions involving Marinol.)

After determining that Marinol could be transferred to schedule III while maintaining the controls required by the Psychotropic Convention, and after gathering the necessary data, on August 7, 1997, DEA requested from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Health, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), a scientific and medical evaluation, and recommendation, as to whether Marinol should be rescheduled, in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(b).

On September 11, 1998, the Acting Assistant Secretary for Health sent to DEA a letter recommending that Marinol be transferred from schedule II to schedule III of the CSA. Enclosed with the September 11, 1998, letter was a document prepared by the FDA entitled "Basis for the Recommendation for Rescheduling Marinol Capsules from schedule II to schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)." In this document, the FDA defines the Marinol product as "an FDA-approved drug product containing synthetically produced dronabinol dissolved in sesame oil and encapsulated in soft gelatin capsules (2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg per dosage unit)." The document contained a review of the factors which the CSA requires the Secretary to consider, which are set forth in 21 U.S.C. 811(c).

The Proposed Rule

On November 7, 1998, the then-Acting Deputy Administrator of DEA published a notice of proposed rule making in the Federal Register (63 FR 59751), proposing to transfer Marinol from schedule II to schedule III of the CSA. The proposed rule was based on the DHHS scientific and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendation and DEA’s independent evaluation. Also under the proposed rule, 21 CFR 1312.30 would be amended to include Marinol as a schedule III non-narcotic controlled substance specifically designated as requiring import and export permits pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(b)(2) and 953(e)(3). As discussed above, this proposed amendment to 21 CFR 1312.30 is necessary for the United States to continue to meet its obligations under the Psychotropic Convention. The notice of proposed rule provided an opportunity for all interested persons to submit their comments, objections, or requests for hearing in writing to DEA on or before December 7, 1998.

Comments From the Public

DEA received comments regarding the proposed rule from ten persons. Nine of the commenters supported the proposed rule. One commenter objected to the proposed rule and requested a hearing thereon. The comments are briefly summarized below.
The nine commenters who supported the proposed rule included organizations, physicians, and one individual. Eight of the nine commenters who supported the proposed rule expressed the opinion that Marinol is a safe and effective alternative to smoking marijuana for treatment of nausea and loss of appetite and has low abuse potential.

One commenter who supported the proposed rule expressed the view that the rescheduling of Marinol should not serve as a substitute for making marijuana legally available for medical use. This commenter stated that it supported the use of marijuana for medical purposes and, therefore, wished to emphasize that the proposed rule affected the CSA status of Marinol--not that of marijuana, which remains a schedule I controlled substance.
The one commenter who objected to the proposed rule, and requested a hearing thereon, asserted that Marinol should not be transferred to schedule III unless and until marijuana and all other THC-containing drugs are simultaneously and likewise rescheduled. This commenter asserted that Marinol has the same potential for abuse as marijuana and all other THC-containing drugs. This commenter agreed with the proposed rule that Marinol’s potential for abuse is less than the "high potential for abuse" commensurate with schedules I and II of the CSA. Accordingly, this commenter agreed that Marinol should be transferred to a less restrictive schedule than schedule II. However, this commenter disagreed with what would be the resultant status of Marinol vis-a-vis marijuana and THC if the NPRM becomes final: Marinol would be in schedule III while marijuana and THC would remain in schedule I. This commenter asserted that the CSA prohibited transferring
Marinol to a less restrictive schedule unless marijuana and all THC-containing drugs are simultaneously transferred to the same schedule. DEA has determined that this commenter’s objections are based on a misinterpretation of the CSA, which can be addressed, as a matter of law, without conducting a fact-finding hearing. Accordingly, as this commenter presented no material issues of fact, DEA denied this commenter’s request for a hearing.

Findings

Relying on the scientific and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendations of the Assistant Secretary for Health, and based on DEA’s independent review thereof, the Deputy Administrator of the DEA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b), finds that:
(1) Based on information now available, Marinol has a potential for abuse less than the drugs or other substances in schedules I and II.

(Marijuananews note: Then it necessarily follows that marijuana must also have "a potential for abuse less than the drugs or other substances in schedules I and II.")
See
Federal Judge In McCormick Case Says
There No Way To Distinguish Between Marinol and Marijuana In Urine Tests.
McCormick To Remain Free On Half Million Dollar Bail.
(2) Marinol is a FDA-approved drug product and has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States; and (3) Abuse of Marinol may lead to moderate of low physical dependence or high psychological dependence.

Rescheduling Action

Based on the above findings, the Deputy Administrator of the DEA concludes that Marinol should be transferred from schedule II to schedule III. Schedule III regulations will, among other things, allow five prescription refills in six months and lessen record keeping requirements and distribution restrictions. The schedule III control of Marinol will become effective July 2, 1999, except that certain regulatory provisions governing registrants who handle Marinol will take effect as indicated below. In the event that the regulations impose special hardships on the registrants, the DEA will entertain any justified request for an extension of time to comply with the schedule III regulations regarding Marinol. The applicable regulations are as follows.