CHAVEZ SENTENCE IS CRIMINAL
From The Orange County Register
January 30, 1999
http://www.ocregister.com/
letters@link.freedom.comBy Alan W. Bock
Note: Mr. Bock is the Registers senior editorial writer
(Marijuananews note: Alan Bock is a good friend and one of the best
libertarian writers in America. The Register has given the Chavez case excellent coverage,
often on its editorial page. Alan has said it here better than I could. This is an
incredible miscarriage of justice.)
See
Orange County Weekly
Names Marvin Chavez Man Of The Year
and
A Column And An
Article Cast Light On Chavez Prosecution
and
Chavez Found Guilty;
Faces Up To 7 Years In Case Marked By Judicial, Prosecutorial, And Police Misconduct
5 Articles
Marvin Chavezs severe sentence, handed down Friday, points
up the importance of developing guidelines and protocols for the orderly and legal
implementation of Prop. 215.
Mr. Chavez was sentenced by Judge Thomas J. Borris in Orange Countys West Court
to 6 years in state prison for selling marijuana, slightly less than a potential penalty
of 8 years. Mr. Chavez contended he was attempting to deliver marijuana to patients who
needed it, under protection of Proposition 215, passed by voters in 1996, which allows
marijuana use with a doctors recommendation. Prosecutors claimed the transaction was
a simple sale, which is still illegal under state law. Mr. Chavez plans to appeal.
In the wake of Mr. Chavezs sentence, sick and disabled people with a legitimate
need for marijuana have no clearer idea of how to obtain their medicine legitimately than
they did before.
If anything, James Silva, one of Mr. Chavezs attorneys, had it right when he told
us after the sentencing, "The message this sends to patients is simple: hide."
It shouldnt be that way. And it could and should have been less painful for all
concerned.
The first mistake was made by law enforcement officials who
refused to speak or meet with Mr. Chavez after Prop. 215 was approved. A patient himself,
Mr. Chavez early on announced his intention to develop a cooperative to permit patients
access to medical marijuana and tried to elicit advice and cooperation from law
enforcement officials.
Instead of sitting down with him and saying, "Listen, these are the rules. If you
follow them youll be OK, if you dont youre going to jail," the
DAs office commenced undercover investigations against him. In other localities in
California local officials have closed medical marijuana distribution operations through
civil injunctions rather than criminal charges.
Mr. Chavez, as it turned out, could not look to Prop. 215 to help him in court. Judge
Borris prohibited the jury to consider Prop. 215 during their deliberations. Consequently,
the jury considered a narrow transaction and, on a larger scale, the final outcome does
little to help develop legal guidelines for giving patients access to medical marijuana
through legitimate channels.
See
Judge Allows Jury
To Hear References To Prop 215 In Chavez Trial -- Police Admit Lying Editorial and
Article
Judge Borris, to be fair, was looking at an imperfect person in this defendant. Mr.
Chavez had had previous brushes with the lawin fact, he received the injuries that
led to his disabilities while in prison on a cocaine possession charge (he says he stopped
doing it). One of those violations took place when he was released on his own
recognizance. So it might be understandable that Judge Borris would refuse to release Mr.
Chavez on probation without prison time.
But the magnitude of the sentence still seems on the high end of
the range in sentencing guidelines. Mr. Chavez may have tried to implement Prop. 215
imperfectly, even illegally, but he was trying to follow the proposition the best way he
knew how. We talked to many patients who attended the trial who have been helped by Mr.
Chavez. The authorities should have worked with him rather than pose as patients to meet
him, ask for marijuana, then "sting" him when a voluntary donation to the group
changed hands.
James Silva and J. David Nick, Mr. Chavezs attorneys, say they will try to ensure
that Mr. Chavez has access to the medicine to which he himself is legally entitledas
all parties in this case have explicitly acknowledgedwhile he is in custody.
Others need to step up on this issue. California Attorney General Bill Lockyers
office says he is assembling a task force to develop a statewide plan to implement Prop.
215. Perhaps he should enter the appellate process on Mr.
Chavezs behalf as well. Newly elected Gov. Gray Davis has the authority to pardon
Mr. Chavez or to commute his sentence.
Local officials can help also. Sheriff Mike Carona and District Attorney Anthony
Rackauckas could meet with people on all sides of the issue who have a stake in the
development of consistent policies toward medical marijuana patients and establish
guidelines that will tell people how to avoid running afoul of the law. The county
supervisors could study the matter and develop an implementing ordinance. Council members
in local cities could develop guidelines and ordinancesas is happening in fits and
starts in other California cities.
Mr. Chavez will lose more of his life to incarceration in large part because state and
local officials failed to implement the voters mandate. That shouldnt happen
again.
Copyright: 1999 The Orange County Register

(Marijuananews note: The following is a letter that Alan Bock
wrote the judge.)
MARVIN CHAVEZ DOESNT DESERVE JAIL TIME
From The Orange County Register
January 29, 1999
http://www.ocregister.com/
letters@link.freedom.com
By Alan W. Bock
Note: Mr. Bock is the Registers senior editorial writer
I understand that a number of people have written letters to Judge Thomas J. Borris of
the West County Court in Westminster regarding todays sentencing of Marvin Chavez,
who was found guilty on several marijuana-related counts last November. Here is mine:
Dear Judge Borris:
The jury found Marvin Chavez guilty on some counts. That was
virtually inevitable given the conscientiousness with which the jurors took the
instruction that Proposition 215 (Section 11362.5 of the Health and Safety Code) was to
play no part in their deliberations.
But it would be a gross miscarriage of justice if Mr. Chavez were sentenced to prison
time. You sat through the entire trial, as did I, and saw things the jury didnt see.
You know that while Marvin Chavez made some mistakes and may have broken the law, he was
engaged in a good-faith and above-board effort to implement the will of the voters when
they passed Prop. 215. Officials should explain what he did wrong, then work with him to
do things right, not throw him in jail. "Buyers clubs" in other parts of
the state have been closed through civil actions, not criminal charges.
I remember talking with Carl Armbrust, the deputy DA who prosecuted this case, in the
halls of various courthouses. In an informal setting, he was free with his theory of the
case: that Marvin Chavez was a sophisticated marijuana dealer who cleverly used the
Compassionate Use Act to cover his nefarious and highly profitable dealings. He even
bandied about figures how much drug cops said large quantities could be bought for
and the like -- to underpin his theory that Mr. Chavez was making a lot of money.
But Mr. Armbrust didnt present that theory in court. True, he said that under the
law Mr. Chavez was nothing but a marijuana seller, but he didnt try to document his
sophistication or vast profits. Thats becauseas Mr.
Armbrust knows and probably knew all alongthere was no evidence that thats
what Marvin Chavez was about.
If anything, the evidence is that Mr. Chavez is guilty mainly of an excess of
compassion and naivete when he meets people with a convincing story about physical
suffering. Mr. Chavez should have been more suspicious of the undercover cops who
entrapped him. He probably should have been more sophisticated in the way he ran his
support group. Those shortcomings made him vulnerable to law enforcement officials more
concerned with proving that Prop. 215 was a mistake than with devising ways to implement
it in a lawful and honorable fashion.
I followed Marvin Chavezs efforts for several years and in
the last year Ive gotten to know him reasonably well. Ive been to his modest
house and had long talks with him and with other patients. Im convinced there was no
criminal intent in what he has done.
Yes, theres resentment about aspects of
the legal system and public officials who have refused to meet with him or discuss ways in
which he might help to meet the needs of patients who have a legal right to have access to
marijuana. But theres no criminal intent.
Marvin Chavez tried to address some of the real problems that flowed from the fact that
Prop. 215 (like most laws) was imperfect. The measure gave bona fide patients (and
"primary caregivers," that amorphous term that still lacks anything resembling a
rigorous definition) exemption from laws against possessing, using and cultivating
marijuana. But it doesnt create an exemption from laws against selling, distributing
or transporting marijuana.
That might call for some wiggle-room in interpreting how those laws apply to medical
patients, as more than one appeals-court judgeconcerned that a "right"
that cant be exercised is an absurdityhas suggested. But it definitely creates
problems.
Patients can grow marijuana in their homes, but it takes six
months for the plants to mature. And some cant grow it. Where will they get it? In
the absence of action by the state to implement the lawe.g., allowing pharmacies to
stock it with supplies from government-run plantationsthe most common answer is the
black market. Where but the black market can you even get seeds?
Marvin Chavez, starting from a limited knowledge base, tried to create a "white
market" for medical marijuana. He contacted law enforcement officials to seek
cooperation and counsel. He received none. He made mistakes; he may even have broken the
law. But he was trying to do the right thingto implement a law passed by the people,
which opponents have not tried to overturn in court because the effort would surely
fail in the face of failure by authorities to do so.
Sentence him to community service setting up a distribution network that meets every
legal criterion, with the stipulation that no marijuana changes hands until you or a panel
of judges has reviewed it for strict legality. Or sentence him to strict probation and
keep an eye on him. But if Marvin Chavez serves even a day in prison
for trying imperfectly to do the right thing it will be a grave injustice.
Copyright: 1999 The Orange County Register