|
|
User's Guide to Marijuana News
Top Stories
Sponsored Links
Head Shop
Drug Test (Highest Quality Drug Test Kits and Cleansers)
How To Pass A Drug Test
Pass A Drug Test
Drug Testing Information
Home Remedies To Pass A Drug Test
Ways To Pass A Drug Test
Passing A Drug Test
|
|
California Constitution
Specifically Prohibits State Officials From Using Federal Laws
As An Excuse For Not Enforcing State Laws Like Prop 215 Without A Court Ruling.
Great Orange County Register Editorial.
(Marijuananews note: The Orange County Register
has had many great editorials supporting medical marijuana.)See
Kubby Letter Gets
Prize From Orange County Register
and
Pending Amendments To
Prop 215 Show the Danger Of Appeasing Narks
Critique from The Orange County Register
November 8, 1999
From The Orange County Register
letters@link.freedom.com
http://www.ocregister.com/
LAYING DOWN (ON) THE LAW
Last Tuesday a group of medical marijuana activists led by Proposition 215 co-author and
registered nurse Anna Boyce presented the Orange County Board of Supervisors a petition
asking it to begin implementing the medical marijuana law California voters approved three
years ago.
The supervisors greeted the petition with stony silence. Afterward, however, Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo told reporters that the matter is
"significantly more complicated than that." The problem, he said, is that Prop.
215 contradicts federal law.
Mr. Jaramillo told us on Friday that it isn't that potential conflict that's so important
as the fact that there's no clear policy for the Sheriff's Department to follow. He is
aware of the following, for example.
Article III, Section 3.5 of the California Constitution (adopted in 1978) states that "An administrative agency, including an administrative agency
created by the Constitution or an initiative statute, has no power: ... (c) to declare a
statute unenforceable, or to refuse to enforce a statute, on the basis that federal law or
federal regulations prohibit the enforcement of such statute unless an appellate court has
made a determination that the enforcement of such a statute is prohibited by federal law
or federal regulations."
No appellate court has done so in regard to Prop. 215. In fact, no legal challenge has
been filed seeking to invalidate the law on the basis of a conflict with federal laws or
regulations - or for any reason.
See
Orange County
Register Says The Federal Court
"has effectively invited California officials to craft guidelines
for the use of medical marijuana that will keep the federal government off their backs.
They should accept the invitation immediately."
This country has gone a long way in the last 70 years or so in the direction of completely
centralized power, with the national government calling all the shots. But it hasn't gone
all the way yet.
The attitude of state officials, when a potential conflict between state and federal
laws is perceived, still should be to enforce state law and let the national government
use the courts to change the situation if necessary.
And it turns out the California Constitution (in a provision adopted
in 1978) explicitly requires that course of action. Our conclusion?
Government officials are required by the California Constitution to enforce and implement
Prop. 215 unless and until an appellate court orders them not to do so.
Because of a threatened gubernatorial veto the Legislature couldn't come up with
guidelines. The state attorney general could issue guidelines but he hasn't. In Orange
County the Board of Supervisors should act and act quickly.
Copyright: 1999 The Orange County Register
|
|
|
Supported |
|
|
Topics |
|
Fri 16th 2008f May 2008
|
|
|
Site Navigation |
|
|