May 15, 1998
See Federal Judge
To Issue Injunction Against Clubs;But Does Not Foreclose "possibility of a medical
necessity defense"San Francisco Examiner
letters@examiner.com
http://www.examiner.com/
By Ray Delgado, Examiner Staff
POT CLUBS VOW TO DEFY JUDGES ORDER
Citing federal laws, court is demanding they stop giving out medical marijuana
Another crushing blow for proponents of medical marijuana, another defiant pledge to
keep going.
But keeping the doors open to four pot clubs across Northern California isnt
going to be so easy in the wake of the strongest legal setback yet delivered by a federal
judge.
On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer sided with the federal
governments argument that the Cannabis Healing Center and three other clubs in
Northern California are violating federal drug laws and he ordered the clubs shut down.
The preliminary injunction goes into effect once Breyer reviews arguments from both
parties and signs the injunction, which could occur as early as Monday afternoon. What
happens after that will be up to the clubs.
"Its the saddest day for medical marijuana that I
can envisage," said Tony Serra, an attorney for local club founder Dennis Peron.
"I believe Judge Breyers decision is morally bankrupt."
Several of the clubs, including the S.F. operation, have vowed to defy the injunction
and risk a raid by federal marshals if Breyer then holds them in contempt and orders them
forcibly shut down.
But Breyer could also allow the clubs to remain open while ordering a contempt hearing.
That trial would allow the defense to present a number of legal challenges that could keep
the clubs open.
"Were allowed to argue the medical necessity defense
if we break the injunction, which we plan to do,"
said Peron, who predicted
that his act of defiance would be followed by undercover federal marshals trying to
purchase marijuana with a doctors note next week.
Breyers ruling expressly avoided deciding on the
legality of a sick person possessing pot for medical use or the possibility that local
governments might take over the distribution of medical marijuana, an idea floated by San
Francisco District Attorney Terence Hallinan. Californias Proposition 215, passed by
voters in 1996, legalized the cultivation and medical use of marijuana by patients with
AIDS, cancer, glaucoma and a variety of other illnesses.
The Justice Department filed civil suits in January seeking to halt operations of six
clubs: Perons Cannabis Cultivators Club and Flower Therapy Medical Marijuana Club in
San Francisco, and similar operations in Oakland, Santa Cruz, Ukiah and Fairfax. The
Flower Therapy and Santa Cruz clubs have since closed and the Cannabis Cultivators Club
renamed itself the Cannabis Healing Center.
The other 11 clubs in the state, including major ones in Los
Angeles and San Jose, were not named in the suits but could now become targets.
U.S. Attorney Michael Yamaguchi hailed Breyers decision and asked the clubs to
close down voluntarily.
"Federal law is clear and Judge Breyers opinion is clear - the distribution
or cultivation of marijuana is unlawful," Yamaguchi said. "I call on all of the
marijuana distribution clubs in California to take cognizance of this order and
voluntarily shut down."
Also praising the decision was state Attorney General Dan Lungren, a leader in the
effort to shut the clubs down through legal challenges and enforcement efforts soon after
they opened.
"Were pleased by the courts decision," said Matt Ross, spokesman
for Lungrens office. "Its consistent with what we have always held, which
is that cannabis buyers clubs are not allowed under state or federal law."
Ross said the attorney generals office would continue to fight in state Superior
Court for a preliminary injunction to close down the Cannabis Healing Center.
Organizers at three of the four cannabis clubs mentioned in the decision vowed to defy
the order while the director of the fourth one, the Ukiah Cannabis Buyers Club, said
he was still weighing the risks.
"Were looking at alternatives and seeing what we can do," said Marvin
Lehrman, director of the Ukiah club, which treats 200 patients regularly. "Its a daily feeling we have that were facing down the
federal government and they can come at any moment. I see them as being heavy-handed and
mean-spirited, but Im not afraid of them."
Oakland Cannabis Club Executive Director Jeff Jones said he would defy the order and
was awaiting his day in court.
"What were doing here is a necessity to patients," Jones said.
"Because of Prop. 215, we feel that what were doing here is within the
law."
Robert Raich, attorney for the Oakland club, said the
judges decision opened up a variety of legal avenues to pursue in defense of the
clubs, most notably arguing that marijuana is a medical necessity for sick patients and
that citizens have constitutional rights to be free from pain and to dictate their own
medical treatment.
Those arguments would be heard before a jury and must be either accepted or rejected
unanimously, a chance Peron is willing to take.
"We believe we can defend ourselves," Peron said. "If we do so
successfully, well bring this issue into the national arena. Were going to
have our day in court."