AOL and Disney Help The Drug
Czar Encourage Children To Use Hard Drugs
By Getting Their Parents to Lie To Them About Marijuana.
Cynical Distortion Of IOM Report
(Marijuananews note: Disney and AOL have become
involved in a remarkably cynical bit of prohibitionist propaganda disguised as "drug
education."
They can never seem to understand that when kids find out that they have been lied to
about marijuana, they think that they have been lied to about everything else, including
inhalants and hard drugs. This will also undermine the trust between parents and
children.
I hope that Steve Case of AOL and Michael Eisner of Disney get counseling.)
From the PR Newswire;
March 23, 1999
WHITE HOUSE DRUG CZAR BARRY R. MCCAFFREY TO LAUNCH NEW
INTERACTIVE DRUG PREVENTION CONTENT AREAS FOR KIDS AND PARENTS WITH ABC/DISNEY AND AMERICA
ONLINE
Press Release
March 23, 1999
WHO:
Director Barry R. McCaffrey, White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Rep. Steny
H. Hoyer (D-Md., 5th) Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz., 5th) Representatives
from ABC/Disney and America Online
WHERE:
Cannon House Office Building, Room 311 Independence Ave. & New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC
WHEN:
Wednesday, March 24 1:50 p.m. EST
Members of media invited to experience ABC/Disney and AOLs new
drug prevention content.
2:10 p.m. Remarks, media Q&A and photo opportunities
WHAT: Director McCaffrey, Congressional sponsors and corporate partners will
announce two new, exceptional interactive drug prevention content areasone designed
for kids and available on the World Wide Web, the other for parents
who are members of AOL. These unprecedented interactive resources empower decision
making among young people and provide a drug prevention community for parents and other
adults who care about raising drug-free children.
The sites are part of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign
and demonstrate the importance of public/private partnerships with industry leaders such
as ABC/Disney and AOL.
Sponsored by Reps. Hoyer and Kolbe, this open house emphasizes ONDCPs commitment
to leveraging the interactive medium to educate adults and children about the effects of
illicit drugs.
(Marijuananews note: There are links to the Partnership for A Drug-Free America site and
to the Czars on little jewel, ProjectKnow.com)
See
Page On The Drug
Czars Web SiteProjectknow.ComIs Called "True Lies" And It
Truly Is
CONTACT: Jennefer Traeger, 202-828-9733, Donna Hicks, 202-828-8813, or Steve Panton,
202-395-6627, all for the Office of National Drug Control** Policy. SOURCE Executive
Office of the President; White
House Office of
National Drug Control Policy -0-03/23/99 /PRNewswire --
March 23/ CO:
Executive Office of the President;
White House Office of National Drug Control Policy; America Online;
ABC/Disney
District of Columbia
{PRNewswire:Healthcare-0323.01907} 03/23/99
ABC's http://www.Freevibe.com
will have "anti-drug" commercials aimed at kids.
Here is the worst excerpts Of Reefer Madness from AOL Key Word: Drug Help
This was linked from the opening screen on AOL:
Parents who themselves tried marijuana face additional
difficulties. They tend to think that their own experiences will help them spot their
kids drug use. Or, that its okay for a kid to experiment with a
"harmless" drug like pot.
See
Is marijuana really
harmless, like everyone has been saying?
After all, it didnt ruin their lives. But today s
marijuana is up to four times stronger than in the 1960s.
(Marijuananews note: That is a clue that they dont have a clue or just dont
care about he truth. There is no data on marijuana THC levels from the 1960s.)
See
Marijuana
Prohibition And Potency, Price, And Safety --
"Is Marijuana Stronger Than It Was Back In the '60s, When Everyone Thought It Was
Harmless?"
Analysis By Richard Cowan
Why You Shouldnt Allow Your Children To Smoke Marijuana
Some parents who saw marijuana being widely used in their youth have wondered, "Is
marijuana really so bad for my child?" The answer is an emphatic "yes," and
parents should familiarize themselves with these reasons:
Marijuana is illegal.
Marijuana now exists in forms that are stronger with
higher levels of THC, the psychoactive ingredient than in the 1960s.
Studies show that someone who smokes five joints a week may be taking in as many
cancer-causing chemicals as someone who smokes a full pack of cigarettes every day.
(Marijuananews note: This is saying that marijuana is 20 times
as dangerous as smoking tobacco. There is no data to support this and the standard lie
is only five times as dangerous. That is inflation!)
Courtesy U.S. Department of Education: Growing Up DrugFree:
A Parents Guide to Prevention 1998
From the introduction to the site called a "Virtual
Tour" linked from the Main Page:
"If you tried pot when you were a kid, and nothing bad happened, you might think
using marijuana is harmless. But marijuana and hashish-related emergency room visits have
increased about 360% since 1991. Marijuana use is also dangerous since it can lead to the
use of other more potent drugs."
(Marijuananews note: The hospital emergency room numbers
are really dishonest. First, these numbers are mentions of marijuana, not causes of
admissions. If someone is hospitalized for heroin, but mentions marijuana, it is duly
noted on this form.
Second, the number is still very small, a fraction of one percent of all admissions, so a
large percentage increase is meaningless. Whoever used that number has to know that they
are lying. It is one of HHS Secretary Shalalas favorites.)
(Marijuananews note: Next they lie about the IOM report.
See
Will The Titanic Of
Marijuana Prohibition Be Sunk By The Ice Cube Of The IOM Report?
-- Analysis.
and links to IOM Summary, etc.
This is the complete text of this section. It is really cynical. At
no point does it acknowledge that the report says that there are people for whom there is
currently no substitite. "There is no clear alternative for people suffering from
chronic conditions that might be relieved by smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS
wasting."
At no point does it acknowledge that the report said these people should be given medical
marijuana.)
Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base
What did the Office for National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) ask the Institute of
Medicine (IOM) to do?
In January 1997, ONDCP asked the Institute of Medicine to conduct a review of the
scientific evidence for assessing the potential health benefits and risks of marijuana and
its constituent cannabinoids.
ONDCP believed that an objective and independent evaluation of research regarding the
use of marijuana for medicinal purposes was appropriate given the ongoing debate about
cannabis and its health effects.
Specifically, ONDCP asked that IOM examine:
- The science base and gaps in scientific knowledge regarding use of marijuana for
medicinal purposes.
- Scientific information about marijuanas mechanism of action.
- Peer-reviewed literature on the uses of marijuana.
- Costs associated with various forms of the component chemical compounds in marijuana and
other pharmacotherapies for special medical conditions.
How extensive was this study?
This study is the most comprehensive summary and analysis of what is known about the
medical use of marijuana.
It emphasizes evidence-based medicine (derived from knowledge and experience informed
by rigorous scientific analysis), as opposed to belief-based medicine (derived from
judgment, intuition, and beliefs untested by rigorous science.
We are delighted that the discussion of medical efficacy and safety of cannabinoids can
now take place within the context of science.
We thank the two principal researchers:
Dr. John A. Benson, Jr. Dean Emeritus and Professor of Medicine at the Oregon Health
Sciences University School of Medicine and President Emeritus of the American Board of
Internal Medicine.
Dr. Stanley J. Watson, Jr.. Co-Director and Senior Research Scientist at the Mental
health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
What does the study say?
1) The study concludes that there is little future in smoked
marijuana as a medically approved medication.
Although marijuana smoke delivers THC and other cannabinoids to the body, it also
delivers harmful substances, including most of those found in tobacco smoke. The long-term
harms from smoking make it a poor drug delivery system, particularly for patients with
chronic diseases.
In addition, cannabis plants contain a variable mixture of biologically active
compounds, therefore they cannot be expected to provide a precisely defined drug effect.
Medicines today are expected to be of known composition and quality. Even in cases
where marijuana can provide relief of symptoms, the crude plant mixture does not meet this
modern expectation.
If there is any future in cannabinoid drugs, it lies with agents of more certain, not
less certain composition. The future of medical marijuana lies in classical
pharmacological drug development.
2. The study notes that advances in cannabinoid science of the last 16 years have given
rise to a wealth of new opportunities for the development of medically useful
cannabinoid-base drugs.
The accumulated data suggest a variety of indications, particularly for pain relief,
controlling nausea, and appetite stimulation. Cannabinoids are being used in symptom
management, not as cures for underlying disease.
The evidence indicates that cannabinoids reduce nausea in about one quarter of patients
receiving cancer chemotherapy. Cannabinoids are not as effective as several other classes
of agents. The least promising categories are movement disorders, epilepsy, and glaucoma.
The effects of cannabinoids on symptoms are generally modest, and
in most cases, there are more effective medications. The study recommends further
research, studies, and pre-clinical and clinical trials so that safe and effective
cannabinoids might be added to the pharmacopoeia of drugs that treat these symptoms.
3. The development and treatment of a rapid onset (that is, within minutes) form of THC
is recommended.
Formulations that can rapidly and directly deliver THC to the circulation include deep
lung aerosols, nasal sprays, nasal gels, sublingual preparations; and rectal
suppositories; the last route is slower and may not be acceptable to many patients. Phase
I clinical studies are underway for deep lung aerosols, nasal sprays, nasal gels, and
sublingual formulations of Marinol.
4. The authors are not confident that cannabinoid-based drugs
will become available.
The report notes that the expectation of high financial returns on investment is what
drives drug development. It underscores that developing new drugs is a capital intensive,
time-consuming process. According to the IOM, the average cost to develop a drugs is
$200-$300 million. The pre-clinical stage normally lasts 5-10 years, while clinical trials
last about five years. On average, the FDA approves one new drug for every 5,000 drugs
evaluated in the pre-clinical stage.
Bringing marijuana to market as a new drug is fraught with uncertainty for at least
three pharmacological reasons: marijuana is a botanical product; it is smoked; and it s a drug with abuse potential.
(Marijuananews note: There are many drugs on Schedule 3
"with abuse potential.)
See
How The IOM
Report Impacts The Move To Have Medical Marijuana Rescheduled
and
Two Days After
The Medical Marijuana Initiatives
The DEA Proposes Making Marinol A Schedule III Drug!! "Like Codeine With
Tylenol."
More Like Cynicism With Desperation
The three marketed botanical preparations are older drugs that came to market years
before safety and efficacy studies were required by legislative amendments in 1938 and
1962, respectively, and before modern chemistry and manufacturing controls came into
being.
The study notes that market outlook in the U.S. is distinctly unfavorable for the
marijuana plant and for cannabinoids found in the plant. Commercial interest in bringing
them to market appears nonexistent.
See
(Marijuananews note: The study was notable in downplaying the
addictiveness of marijuana and the so-called gateway theory, but notice the wording of the
introductions to the next two sections. It tries to give the opposite meaning.)
5. The study provides a detailed analysis of marijuanas
addictiveness.
(Marijuananews note: That is like saying that I am giving a
detailed analysis of the Drug Czar's truthfulness.)
It concludes that marijuana is indisputably reinforcing for many
people. It states that a distinctive marijuana and THC withdrawal syndrome has been
identified, but it is mild and subtle compared to the profound physical syndrome of heroin
withdrawal.
(Marijuananews note: What they really said, "Animal
research demonstrates the potential for dependence, but this potential is observed
under a narrower range of conditions than with benzodiazepines, opiates, cocaine, or
nicotine. Withdrawal symptoms can be observed in animals, but appear to be mild
compared to opiates or benzodiazepines, such as diazepam (Valium ) )
The study notes that few marijuana users become dependent but those who do encounter
problems similar to those associated with dependence on other drugs. Slightly
more than 4% of the general population were dependent on marijuana at one time in their
life.
After alcohol and nicotine, marijuana was the substance most frequently associated with
a diagnosis of substance dependence.
See
The Relative Addictiveness of Drugs According to NIDA's Own Researcher
6. The study notes strikingly regular patterns in the progression
of drug use from adolescence to adulthood.
See
USA Today Runs A
Good Article On The "Gateway Theory" Following IOM Report
The study notes that because it is the most widely used illicit drug, marijuana is
predictably the first illicit drug most people encounter. Not
surprisingly, most users of other illicit drugs have used marijuana first. In fact, most
drug users do not begin their drug use with marijuana; they begin with alcohol and
nicotine and usually when they are too young to do so legally.
The study asserts that progression from marijuana to other drugs arises not from
pharmacological properties of marijuana itself but because marijuana serves as a gateway
to the world of illegal drugs in which youths have greater opportunity and are under
greater social pressure to try other illegal drugs. The study asserts that the factors
that best predict illicit drug use other than marijuana are likely the following: age of
first alcohol or nicotine use, heavy marijuana use, and psychiatric disorders.
The study concludes that, in the sense that marijuana use
typically precedes rather than follows initiation into the use of other illicit drugs, it
is indeed a gateway drug.
(Marijuananews note: This is very sophisticated lying. Sophistry. They reversed the
order of the sentences to change the sense of the report. What the summary really said
was: "In the sense that marijuana use typically precedes rather than follows
initiation of other illicit drug use, it is indeed a "gateway" drug. But
because underage smoking and alcohol use typically precede marijuana use, marijuana is not
the most common, and is rarely the first, "gateway" to illicit drug use.
There is no conclusive evidence that the drug effects of marijuana are causally linked to
the subsequent abuse of other illicit drugs."
Of course, on that basis, caffeine is the ultimate "gateway" drug. Notice that
the IOM used quotes around "gateway" -- but the Czar did not. This is a really
cynical piece of work.)
How will the federal government respond to the study?
(Marijuananews note: I think we are seeing how the federal government is responding, by
lying and continuing to suppress medical marijuana and arrest users.)
The Office of National Drug Control Policy appreciates the contributions made by the
Institute of Medicine to the debate on the medical efficacy and safety of cannabinoids. We
will carefully study the recommendations and conclusions contained in this very detailed
report.
We will continue to rely on the professional judgement of the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and the Surgeon General
on all issues related to the medical value of marijuana and its constituent cannabinoids.
The federal government will continue to support bona fide research of marijuana for
medical use.
Warning from the Drug Czar that there is more to come:
Welcome to the AOL Parents Drug Resource Center.
Like all great parents, you are concerned about your children and the pressures they
are under. The AOL Parents Drug Resource Center is designed to help you learn more
about the world your child lives inwhich is more challenging and in many ways more
tempting than the one in which we were raised.
The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, working together with the
Partnership for a Drug-Free America and America Online, created the Center as a part of
the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign which educates and enables Americas
youth to reject illegal drugs. As a parent or an adult caregiver, you are the most
important element in this delicate equation. Please get involved. Talk to your children.
Use the information and educational resources provided here to make a difference. There
are also areas that allow you to join an online parent-to-parent support group or just
talk with other concerned parents who are looking for answers. You are not alone.
The Center is the first of many online initiatives that are
happening throughout the year. Other anti-drug sites are being developed to reach out and
educate about drug use and its consequences. There will also be special events on AOL such
as chats with celebrity parents and teens as well as experts that will initiate a dialogue
across the online community.
We hope you find the Parents Drug Resource Center and all the other online
initiatives of helpful in keeping your family healthy.
Sincerely,
Barry R. McCaffrey
Director, ONDCP
|