Marijuana News
 


The Original Marijuana Blog
MarijuanaNews.Com with Richard Cowan
Published 2008-05-15 16:20:00
 


User's Guide to Marijuana News

Top Stories


Help Support
Marijuana News


Sponsored Links

Head Shop

Drug Test
(Highest Quality Drug Test Kits and Cleansers)


How To Pass A Drug Test

Pass A Drug Test

Drug Testing Information

Home Remedies To Pass A Drug Test

Ways To Pass A Drug Test

Passing A Drug Test

 

AOL and Disney Help The Drug Czar Encourage Children To Use Hard Drugs
By Getting Their Parents to Lie To Them About Marijuana.
Cynical Distortion Of IOM Report


(Marijuananews note: Disney and AOL have become involved in a remarkably cynical bit of prohibitionist propaganda disguised as "drug education."

They can never seem to understand that when kids find out that they have been lied to about marijuana, they think that they have been lied to about everything else, including inhalants and hard drugs.

This will also undermine the trust between parents and children.

I hope that Steve Case of AOL and Michael Eisner of Disney get counseling.)

From the PR Newswire;
March 23, 1999

WHITE HOUSE DRUG CZAR BARRY R. MCCAFFREY TO LAUNCH NEW INTERACTIVE DRUG PREVENTION CONTENT AREAS FOR KIDS AND PARENTS WITH ABC/DISNEY AND AMERICA ONLINE

Press Release

March 23, 1999

WHO:
Director Barry R. McCaffrey, White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md., 5th) Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz., 5th) Representatives from ABC/Disney and America Online

WHERE:
Cannon House Office Building, Room 311 Independence Ave. & New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC

WHEN:
Wednesday, March 24 1:50 p.m. EST

Members of media invited to experience ABC/Disney and AOL’s new drug prevention content.

2:10 p.m. Remarks, media Q&A and photo opportunities

WHAT: Director McCaffrey, Congressional sponsors and corporate partners will announce two new, exceptional interactive drug prevention content areas—one designed for kids and available on the World Wide Web, the other for parents who are members of AOL. These unprecedented interactive resources empower decision making among young people and provide a drug prevention community for parents and other adults who care about raising drug-free children.

The sites are part of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign and demonstrate the importance of public/private partnerships with industry leaders such as ABC/Disney and AOL.

Sponsored by Reps. Hoyer and Kolbe, this open house emphasizes ONDCP’s commitment to leveraging the interactive medium to educate adults and children about the effects of illicit drugs.

(Marijuananews note: There are links to the Partnership for A Drug-Free America site and to the Czars on little jewel, ProjectKnow.com)

See
Page On The Drug Czar’s Web Site—Projectknow.Com—Is Called "True Lies" And It Truly Is

CONTACT: Jennefer Traeger, 202-828-9733, Donna Hicks, 202-828-8813, or Steve Panton, 202-395-6627, all for the Office of National Drug Control** Policy. SOURCE Executive Office of the President; White

House Office of

National Drug Control Policy -0-03/23/99 /PRNewswire --

March 23/ CO:
Executive Office of the President;
White House Office of National Drug Control Policy; America Online;
ABC/Disney

District of Columbia

{PRNewswire:Healthcare-0323.01907} 03/23/99


ABC's http://www.Freevibe.com will have "anti-drug" commercials aimed at kids.

Here is the worst excerpts Of Reefer Madness from AOL Key Word: Drug Help

This was linked from the opening screen on AOL:

Parents who themselves tried marijuana face additional difficulties. They tend to think that their own experiences will help them spot their kids’ drug use. Or, that it’s okay for a kid to experiment with a "harmless" drug like pot.
See
Is marijuana really harmless, like everyone has been saying?
After all, it didn’t ruin their lives. But today’ s marijuana is up to four times stronger than in the 1960s.

(Marijuananews note: That is a clue that they don’t have a clue or just don’t care about he truth. There is no data on marijuana THC levels from the 1960s.)
See
Marijuana Prohibition And Potency, Price, And Safety -- 
"Is Marijuana Stronger Than It Was Back In the '60s, When Everyone Thought It Was Harmless?"

Analysis By Richard Cowan

Why You Shouldn’t Allow Your Children To Smoke Marijuana

Some parents who saw marijuana being widely used in their youth have wondered, "Is marijuana really so bad for my child?" The answer is an emphatic "yes," and parents should familiarize themselves with these reasons:

Marijuana is illegal.

Marijuana now exists in forms that are stronger — with higher levels of THC, the psychoactive ingredient — than in the 1960s.

Studies show that someone who smokes five joints a week may be taking in as many cancer-causing chemicals as someone who smokes a full pack of cigarettes every day.

(Marijuananews note: This is saying that marijuana is 20 times as dangerous as smoking tobacco. There is no data to support this and the standard lie is only five times as dangerous. That is inflation!)

Courtesy U.S. Department of Education: Growing Up Drug–Free: A Parent’s Guide to Prevention – 1998


From the introduction to the site called a "Virtual Tour" linked from the Main Page:

 

"If you tried pot when you were a kid, and nothing bad happened, you might think using marijuana is harmless. But marijuana and hashish-related emergency room visits have increased about 360% since 1991. Marijuana use is also dangerous since it can lead to the use of other more potent drugs."

(Marijuananews note: The hospital emergency room numbers are really dishonest. First, these numbers are mentions of marijuana, not causes of admissions. If someone is hospitalized for heroin, but mentions marijuana, it is duly noted on this form.

Second, the number is still very small, a fraction of one percent of all admissions, so a large percentage increase is meaningless. Whoever used that number has to know that they are lying. It is one of HHS Secretary Shalala’s favorites.)


(Marijuananews note: Next they lie about the IOM report.

See
Will The Titanic Of Marijuana Prohibition Be Sunk By The Ice Cube Of The IOM Report?
-- Analysis.

and links to IOM Summary, etc.
This is the complete text of this section. It is really cynical. At no point does it acknowledge that the report says that there are people for whom there is currently no substitite. "There is no clear alternative for people suffering from chronic conditions that might be relieved by smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS wasting."

At no point does it acknowledge that the report said these people should be given medical marijuana.)

Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base

What did the Office for National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) ask the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to do?

In January 1997, ONDCP asked the Institute of Medicine to conduct a review of the scientific evidence for assessing the potential health benefits and risks of marijuana and its constituent cannabinoids.

ONDCP believed that an objective and independent evaluation of research regarding the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes was appropriate given the ongoing debate about cannabis and its health effects.

Specifically, ONDCP asked that IOM examine:

  • The science base and gaps in scientific knowledge regarding use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.
  • Scientific information about marijuana’s mechanism of action.
  • Peer-reviewed literature on the uses of marijuana.
  • Costs associated with various forms of the component chemical compounds in marijuana and other pharmacotherapies for special medical conditions.

How extensive was this study?

This study is the most comprehensive summary and analysis of what is known about the medical use of marijuana.

It emphasizes evidence-based medicine (derived from knowledge and experience informed by rigorous scientific analysis), as opposed to belief-based medicine (derived from judgment, intuition, and beliefs untested by rigorous science.

We are delighted that the discussion of medical efficacy and safety of cannabinoids can now take place within the context of science.

We thank the two principal researchers:

Dr. John A. Benson, Jr. Dean Emeritus and Professor of Medicine at the Oregon Health Sciences University School of Medicine and President Emeritus of the American Board of Internal Medicine.

Dr. Stanley J. Watson, Jr.. Co-Director and Senior Research Scientist at the Mental health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

What does the study say?

1) The study concludes that there is little future in smoked marijuana as a medically approved medication.

Although marijuana smoke delivers THC and other cannabinoids to the body, it also delivers harmful substances, including most of those found in tobacco smoke. The long-term harms from smoking make it a poor drug delivery system, particularly for patients with chronic diseases.

In addition, cannabis plants contain a variable mixture of biologically active compounds, therefore they cannot be expected to provide a precisely defined drug effect.

Medicines today are expected to be of known composition and quality. Even in cases where marijuana can provide relief of symptoms, the crude plant mixture does not meet this modern expectation.

If there is any future in cannabinoid drugs, it lies with agents of more certain, not less certain composition. The future of medical marijuana lies in classical pharmacological drug development.

2. The study notes that advances in cannabinoid science of the last 16 years have given rise to a wealth of new opportunities for the development of medically useful cannabinoid-base drugs.

The accumulated data suggest a variety of indications, particularly for pain relief, controlling nausea, and appetite stimulation. Cannabinoids are being used in symptom management, not as cures for underlying disease.

The evidence indicates that cannabinoids reduce nausea in about one quarter of patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Cannabinoids are not as effective as several other classes of agents. The least promising categories are movement disorders, epilepsy, and glaucoma.

The effects of cannabinoids on symptoms are generally modest, and in most cases, there are more effective medications. The study recommends further research, studies, and pre-clinical and clinical trials so that safe and effective cannabinoids might be added to the pharmacopoeia of drugs that treat these symptoms.

3. The development and treatment of a rapid onset (that is, within minutes) form of THC is recommended.

Formulations that can rapidly and directly deliver THC to the circulation include deep lung aerosols, nasal sprays, nasal gels, sublingual preparations; and rectal suppositories; the last route is slower and may not be acceptable to many patients. Phase I clinical studies are underway for deep lung aerosols, nasal sprays, nasal gels, and sublingual formulations of Marinol.

4. The authors are not confident that cannabinoid-based drugs will become available.

The report notes that the expectation of high financial returns on investment is what drives drug development. It underscores that developing new drugs is a capital intensive, time-consuming process. According to the IOM, the average cost to develop a drugs is $200-$300 million. The pre-clinical stage normally lasts 5-10 years, while clinical trials last about five years. On average, the FDA approves one new drug for every 5,000 drugs evaluated in the pre-clinical stage.

Bringing marijuana to market as a new drug is fraught with uncertainty for at least three pharmacological reasons: marijuana is a botanical product; it is smoked; and it s a drug with abuse potential.
(Marijuananews note: There are many drugs on Schedule 3 "with abuse potential.)
See
How The IOM Report Impacts The Move To Have Medical Marijuana Rescheduled
and
Two Days After The Medical Marijuana Initiatives
The DEA Proposes Making Marinol A Schedule III Drug!! "Like Codeine With Tylenol."
More Like Cynicism With Desperation

The three marketed botanical preparations are older drugs that came to market years before safety and efficacy studies were required by legislative amendments in 1938 and 1962, respectively, and before modern chemistry and manufacturing controls came into being.

The study notes that market outlook in the U.S. is distinctly unfavorable for the marijuana plant and for cannabinoids found in the plant. Commercial interest in bringing them to market appears nonexistent.
See
(Marijuananews note: The study was notable in downplaying the addictiveness of marijuana and the so-called gateway theory, but notice the wording of the introductions to the next two sections. It tries to give the opposite meaning.)

5. The study provides a detailed analysis of marijuana’s addictiveness.
(Marijuananews note: That is like saying that I am giving a detailed analysis of the Drug Czar's truthfulness.)
It concludes that marijuana is indisputably reinforcing for many people. It states that a distinctive marijuana and THC withdrawal syndrome has been identified, but it is mild and subtle compared to the profound physical syndrome of heroin withdrawal.
(Marijuananews note: What they really said, "Animal research demonstrates the potential for dependence, but this potential is observed under a narrower range of conditions than with benzodiazepines, opiates, cocaine, or nicotine. Withdrawal symptoms can be observed in animals, but appear to be mild compared to opiates or benzodiazepines, such as diazepam (Valium ) )

The study notes that few marijuana users become dependent but those who do encounter problems similar to those associated with dependence on other drugs. Slightly more than 4% of the general population were dependent on marijuana at one time in their life.

After alcohol and nicotine, marijuana was the substance most frequently associated with a diagnosis of substance dependence.

See
The Relative Addictiveness of Drugs According to NIDA's Own Researcher

6. The study notes strikingly regular patterns in the progression of drug use from adolescence to adulthood.

See
USA Today Runs A Good Article On The "Gateway Theory" Following IOM Report

The study notes that because it is the most widely used illicit drug, marijuana is predictably the first illicit drug most people encounter. Not surprisingly, most users of other illicit drugs have used marijuana first. In fact, most drug users do not begin their drug use with marijuana; they begin with alcohol and nicotine and usually when they are too young to do so legally.

The study asserts that progression from marijuana to other drugs arises not from pharmacological properties of marijuana itself but because marijuana serves as a gateway to the world of illegal drugs in which youths have greater opportunity and are under greater social pressure to try other illegal drugs. The study asserts that the factors that best predict illicit drug use other than marijuana are likely the following: age of first alcohol or nicotine use, heavy marijuana use, and psychiatric disorders.

The study concludes that, in the sense that marijuana use typically precedes rather than follows initiation into the use of other illicit drugs, it is indeed a gateway drug.

(Marijuananews note: This is very sophisticated lying. Sophistry. They reversed the order of the sentences to change the sense of the report. What the summary really said was: "In the sense that marijuana use typically precedes rather than follows initiation of other illicit drug use, it is indeed a "gateway" drug. But because underage smoking and alcohol use typically precede marijuana use, marijuana is not the most common, and is rarely the first, "gateway" to illicit drug use. There is no conclusive evidence that the drug effects of marijuana are causally linked to the subsequent abuse of other illicit drugs."

Of course, on that basis, caffeine is the ultimate "gateway" drug. Notice that the IOM used quotes around "gateway" -- but the Czar did not. This is a really cynical piece of work.)

How will the federal government respond to the study?

(Marijuananews note: I think we are seeing how the federal government is responding, by lying and continuing to suppress medical marijuana and arrest users.)

The Office of National Drug Control Policy appreciates the contributions made by the Institute of Medicine to the debate on the medical efficacy and safety of cannabinoids. We will carefully study the recommendations and conclusions contained in this very detailed report.

We will continue to rely on the professional judgement of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and the Surgeon General on all issues related to the medical value of marijuana and its constituent cannabinoids.

The federal government will continue to support bona fide research of marijuana for medical use.


Warning from the Drug Czar that there is more to come:

Welcome to the AOL Parents’ Drug Resource Center.

Like all great parents, you are concerned about your children and the pressures they are under. The AOL Parents’ Drug Resource Center is designed to help you learn more about the world your child lives in—which is more challenging and in many ways more tempting than the one in which we were raised.

The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, working together with the Partnership for a Drug-Free America and America Online, created the Center as a part of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign which educates and enables America’s youth to reject illegal drugs. As a parent or an adult caregiver, you are the most important element in this delicate equation. Please get involved. Talk to your children. Use the information and educational resources provided here to make a difference. There are also areas that allow you to join an online parent-to-parent support group or just talk with other concerned parents who are looking for answers. You are not alone.

The Center is the first of many online initiatives that are happening throughout the year. Other anti-drug sites are being developed to reach out and educate about drug use and its consequences. There will also be special events on AOL such as chats with celebrity parents and teens as well as experts that will initiate a dialogue across the online community.

We hope you find the Parents’ Drug Resource Center and all the other online initiatives of helpful in keeping your family healthy.

Sincerely,

Barry R. McCaffrey

Director, ONDCP

 
 

Supported
  NORML
RxMarijuana.com
Media Awareness Project
DRCnet.org
Students for a Sensible Drugs Policy

 
Topics
  Fri 16th 2008f May 2008
  General News
Medical Marijuana
Drug Testing
Important Cases
NORML News
Vaporizers
Analysis
Hemp
Marijuana Fun!
Uh Oh, Canada
Go Dutch!
Data
Cannabis Quotes
Media Criticism

 
Site Navigation
  Chronological Index
Search!
User's Guide to Marijuana News
F.A.Q's
Richard Cowan Bio
Contact Richard Cowan

 
Click here for all the news


 

This and all programming is Copyright material.
Request permission to reprint any portion of Marijuananews.Com