See
If The Media
Cannot Report On the Well-Known CIA Role in the Iran/Contra Cocaine Business,
How Can They Begin To Tell The Story of Marijuana Prohibition?
and
Chicago
Tribune Article Supports CIA/Crack Connection -- Favorable Comments On "Dark
Alliance"
and
How the
Establishment Media Suppresses Coverage of CIA's Hard Drug Trafficking
--Fairness & Accuracy In ReportingFrom The Eugene
Weekly
http://www.eugeneweekly.com/
editor@eugeneweekly.com
January 15, 1999
By Alan Pittman
WAITING TO EXHALE
Crack-Contra/CIA scandal still smolders as nation turns its attention to sex scandals.
The CIA-backed Nicaraguan Contras funded their war in Central America with crack sold
on the streets of L.A. ghettoes, according to Gary Webb, a Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist who will speak in Eugene this Saturday.
Webb reported on the links between the CIA, the Contras and the deadly crack cocaine
explosion in the U.S. in a 1996 series of articles in the San Jose Mercury News. After the
series sparked public outrage in Congress and the African-American community, the national
media and the CIA began attacking Webbs reporting as unfounded.
Webb stuck to his story and quit the Mercury News after the paper failed to back him
up. Now, hes published a book, Dark Alliance (Seven Stories Press, 1998) on the
scandal.
Webb will speak at 7:30 pm Jan. 16 at the United Methodist Church behind the Eugene
Public Library. He spoke to EW by telephone from Sacramento about his work uncovering the
crack-Contra/CIA connection.
How are sales of your book going?
Beyond my wildest expectations. I got my first report, and it was stunning. We sold
like 50,000 books in five weeks.
Why did the mainstream press attack your newspaper series?
There were a number of reasons for that. This was a story that
those papers - specifically the Washington Post, New York Times and L.A. Times - could
have done if they had wanted to back in the 80s when this stuff was going on. There
were certainly enough clues around. But in some cases for political reasons, in some cases
for sheer incompetence, nobody ever put the pieces together and figured out what it meant.
So when a little Northern California newspaper comes along 10 years later and has this big
huge story, it pissed them off.
The deeper problem was this is not the kind of story these papers have done for many,
many years. Essentially, youre talking about a crime of state - youve got the
U.S. Government complicit in drug trafficking.
The other thing that I think annoyed them was that the story got out in spite of them.
The big papers are used to being able to set the national agenda for whats news and
isnt news. Here we came along, a paper that nobody on the East
Coast reads, and we put the thing up on the Web with all our supporting documentation,
and I went on talk radio. Suddenly weve got a Web site thats getting a million
hits a day, and everybody is talking about this story that they [the big papers] have
never printed a word of, and their readers are calling them up wondering why the hell
theyre sitting on this story.
You put all that together, and I think theyre natural inclination was, well,
were going to knock the hell out of this thing. The fact that nobody ever found a
factual error in it, I thought was lost in the controversy.
Was the CIA involved in the drug smuggling or did they just turn a blind eye to it?
All my theories ever said was there were CIA agents who knew about it. And we proved
it, we had pictures of a CIA agent meeting with these drug traffickers.
The scenario a lot of people took from that was that this was
a CIA plot to dump cocaine in the black ghettoes. I never found any evidence of that. But
given what has come out since my series - there were two investigations that were done, by
the Justice Department and by the CIA internal investigations - I didnt go nearly
far enough in retrospect. The CIA knew a lot more about this than I would have imagined,
and theyve now admitted it. The problem is you havent seen these stories in
the paper because they contradict everything they were writing two years ago. The agency
has basically confessed and nobody wants to hear the confession because [the big papers]
had all declared them innocent.
How does the Monica Lewinsky scandal compare to the story you uncovered?
Well, that wasnt even a scandal as far as Im concerned. Its just some
guy getting his ashes hauled. This [crack-CIA] thing is a crime of state, and millions of
Americans have paid for this over and over again.
Thats the problem with the press today. Theyll focus on the trivial and
titillating and let the big huge stories just go by in the night because they dont
want to devote the effort to do them. It took me a year to work on this full time.
Reporters dont get that kind of time anymore, they dont get the space to do
that kind of story. You get the space for sex stories.
Nobody is going to get in trouble for writing a story about a politician getting laid.
The stories that I like to do are the stories that get newspapers in trouble. They [the
mainstream press] have just become so timid. I saw it as not even worth hanging around, I
mean, who wants to do that kind of crap?
Whats the significance of this story? It happened a number of years ago under a
different president.
Because were still living with the aftereffects of it. Weve still got crack
raging in inner city neighborhoods, theyre locking people up left and right for
selling minuscule amounts of what government agents were bringing into this country by the
plane-load.
One of the things I hoped to do with this story is open up peoples eyes to this
parallel universe that exists out there in the intelligence community which we rarely if
ever get a glimpse of. I think Washington was scared of that. I dont think they
wanted extensive CIA drug-dealing hearings. Because people would sort of wonder what
theyre spending theyre $26 billion a year on.
Some of the critics said the story said or implied that the CIA was responsible for the
entire crack epidemic. Is that what you were saying?
All I ever said in that story was they were responsible for starting the first major
market for it. What I really saw was really a chain reaction rather than a vast
conspiracy.
But I think the black community, because they have been so put upon over the years and
have been the victims of conspiracies before, saw this as another CIA conspiracy to keep
them down. I never found any evidence of that.
But the more I think about it, its the difference between manslaughter and
murder. Its the intent. The intent was not to poison black America but to raise
money for the Contras, and they didnt really care what it came from. If it involved
selling drugs in black communities, well, this was the price of admission.
The CIA has been involved in some questionable things such as torture and overthrowing
democratically elected governments. Why were your stories surprising to people?
It beats the hell out of me. This is an agency that has murdered foreign leaders, why
would they have any qualms about selling cocaine?
In this country - and I think in a large part due to the mainstream press - we have
this delusion that the CIA is this noble enterprise of honorable men, and theyre
not. You really dont get that prospective until you go to a foreign country where
the CIA is allowed to operate openly and ask people there what they think of the CIA.
Its like asking people about the Klu Klux Klan, they hate them because of the stuff
they do.
Does your experience say a lot about how the press in Washington works?
Absolutely. I get into in the book about the reporter at the Washington Post who
launched the attack against my series. It turns out that the guy actually worked for the
CIA in the 60s [spying on students]. If I was the editor at the Washington Post,
hed be the last person Id assign to cover the CIA. The guys compromised,
hes too close to the agency. You want someone thats going to go in there and
kick some ass, not someone whos going to go out and have lunch with these guys. But
thats the attitude. I worked in the Washington press corps for a while, they want to
be the people they are covering, they didnt want to be reporters.
I think the alternative press is becoming more important as the mainstream press
becomes more corporatized and more sanitized and homogenized. Youd be hard pressed
to go to any major city in the United States and pick up the daily newspaper and tell it
from any other daily newspaper. Theyre all pretty much the same anymore, which is
boring.
If the CIA hadnt been involved, would there still have been a crack epidemic in
the U.S.?
There would have been. It was coming anyway. Whether it [crack] would have wound up in
South Central Los Angeles in the hands of the street gangs is a completely different
question. Thats one well never know the answer to. I doubt it would have
happened the same way, with the same intensity. Were not talking about a little
cocaine, were talking about tons that were allowed to come into this country through
this drug ring.
Eugene Weekly Editors note: Eugene Media Action, a committee of Eugene Peace
Works, organized Webbs talk in Eugene. The group works for
more accuracy and diversity in the mainstream media and recently opened a Community Media
Center in the Growers Market at 454 Willamette.
Copyright: Eugene Weekly 1999.