See
Review of All The
Proposed Oregon Marijuana Initiatives Which Do Police Fear Most?October
14, 1998
From the Willamette Week
mzusman@wweek.com
http://www.wweek.com/
Our Guide To The 1998 Ballot Measures
CHAINSAWS, BONGS & ONE-EYED JACKS
Measure 57
Recriminalizes Possession Of Small Amounts Of Marijuana
Perceived Problem
The demon weed
How It Would Work
This measures history is as long as a Rastafarians dreadlocks and just as
twisted. Twenty-five years ago, Oregon was the second state in the nation to decriminalize
possession of small amounts of pot. Last session, the Legislature suddenly started
worrying about it. Lawmakers passed a bill to recriminalize possession of less than an
ounce, which the governor "reluctantly" signed. Then some motivated marijuana
advocates (hows that for an oxymoron?) gathered enough signatures to force the
Legislature to halt enactment of the law and refer it to the ballot for voters to decide.
Hence we are forced to wade into a silly debate that was resolved
a quarter of a century ago. Under current lawand if the measure failsan adult
caught with less than an ounce of marijuana is simply given a citation and ordered to pay
a fine between $500 and $1,000.
If Measure 57 passes, pot-carrying adults could be charged with a crime (a misdemeanor)
and fined. They could also be incarcerated, but thats highly unlikely. Authorities
say theyll continue to treat most marijuana possession cases as infractions. Many
other pot offenders will probably be sentenced to probation. Juvenile offenders will be
forced into diversion programs and lose their drivers licenses.
Ultimate Conclusion
Why are we suddenly threatening pot smokers with criminal
sanctions? Proponents say its about kids, and they point to a statistic from the
state Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs that at first glance seems startling:
Since 1990 Oregon eighth graders use of marijuana has tripled and is 36 percent
above the national average.
Even us squishy liberals at WW dont think pre-pubescent puffing is a good thing.
But were sober enough to see through the smoke and mirrors. That statistic has
nothing to do with decriminalization 25 years ago. Marijuana use among Oregon teens has
risen and fallen over the last 10 years, independent of any changes in laws regarding its
use. And although reported pot use among Oregon eighth graders is higher today than in
1990, its lower than in 1986 and 1988. Furthermore, the surveys dont
necessarily show how much pot is being used. It just shows how many people are reporting
pot use.
Blame this measure on Portland Police Chief Charles Moose and his buddies in
blue. They wont admit it, but the Police Chiefs Association, which brought
recriminalization to the Legislature last session, wasnt so much worried about kids.
Instead, it was frothing to expand its search and seizure powers. Making pot use a crime
would allow police to search people caught with a jointand perhaps find evidence of
more serious crimes.
Were opposed to expanding search and seizure powers any further, particularly since
those powers were just expanded in July to allow more searches of people who havent
even been accused of any crime.
Were also concerned about abuses of power that recriminalization could
bring. Police have already conceded that the new law will be only selectively enforced. So
who, exactly, are they going to bust?
See
Eugene Paper
Opposes Oregon Recriminalization Referendum; "Invites Selective Enforcement"
Interestingly, even the proponents have backed away from this
one. Theyve raised exactly $309. Chief Moose, meanwhile, is nowhere to be seen on
this issue.
You Oughta Know
This one is kind of confusing, so put down that bong and listen very closely: A vote in
the no column is a vote for peace, love and understanding. Vote yes and youre just
saying no to drugs. Got it?

Measure 67
Exempts People With Debilitating Conditions From State Laws That Prohibit Growing And
Using Marijuana
Perceived Problem
Too hard to score if youre sore
How It Would Work
Despite what opponents may claim, if this measure passes, your doctor wont have
free reign to say "take two hits and call me in the morning," every time you get
a case of the sniffles. The measure is limited to specific conditions such as cancer,
glaucoma and HIV, as well as things like cachexia (malnutrition or "wasting,"
frequently associated with AIDS), severe pain and nausea, seizures and muscle spasms.
People with these ailments or symptoms would need a doctor to confirm that medical
marijuana may help. Patients would then register with the State Health Division for a
medical-marijuana card. With the card they would, in essence, have permission from the
state to maintain seven marijuana plants (three mature, four immature) and carry up to one
ounce on their person. For those who cant grow their own, a "primary
caregiver" can be chosen to be the green thumb.
Ultimate Conclusion
Opponents raise three serious concerns.
First, Measure 67 would send the wrong message to children. If Johnny sees grandpa
light up after chemotherapy, the little tyke may think theres nothing wrong with
taking a toke himself.
Second, there is debate over the actual medicinal value. There need to be more studies
of marijuana, Measure 67 foes say. If the feds consequently approve the drug, reefer
should be reclassified and available through doctors, who can control and monitor usage
with clearly understood guidelines. The current measure allows people to self-medicate as
if pot were echinacea.
Finally, law-enforcement officials say Measure 67 would disrupt their lives. For
starters, theyre not too keen on the requirement that if police officers seize
plants from someone who uses the medical-marijuana defense, they have to keep the cannabis
alive.
But their biggest gripe is that the measure provides an out for people who dont
get a card: Anyone who gets busted can attempt to use medical marijuana as a defense in
courteven for conditions not listed in the law. Cops and prosecutors fear that
defense attorneys and sympathetic doctors will tie the courts up with medical-marijuana
claims, some of them bogus. If the measure is truly about medicine, they ask, why leave
that loophole?
But all those arguments fall flat for people who are sick and dying.
WW has spoken with several people with a variety of ailments
who have been secretly using marijuana for years. Were not talking about Deadheads;
were talking about members of the Elks Lodge.
For them, Marinol, the synthetic THC, does not work.
See
Perhaps The Single
Most Damning Article On Medical Marijuana Fiasco I Have Ever Read Without Intending
To Be
Its true that some able-bodied stoners will try to use medical marijuana as a
defense when they get busted. And the courts will have to deal with that. If it becomes a
serious enough problem, the Legislature can fix it.
As for further study, whether you blame it on the drug war, the pharmaceutical
companies, the politicians or the American Medical Association, there hasnt been
enough pressure on the feds to get them to take action on medical marijuana. If this
measure, and similar measures elsewhere, pushes them in that direction, all the better.
Until then, sick people should not have to buy their medicine on the street.
You Oughta Know
So far, all the money in support of this measure ($153,897) has come from Americans for
Medical Rights. AMR originally formed in California for Proposition 215, which legalized
medical marijuana there, and is now funding six other medical-marijuana measuresin
Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Nevada, Colorado and the District of Columbia. AMR advocates legalizing marijuana for everyone, not just sick people.
(Ed. note: Actually not. AMR is only about the medical use.)
But the chief petitioner, Dr. Richard Bayer, is no pothead. His drug of choice is
Mountain Dew, and he says hes not trying to make pot legal. He just wants to make it
available for those who need it.
See
A Portrait Of The
Doctor Leading The Oregon Medical Marijuana Drive