ABC News Medical Writer
Strongly Backs Medical Marijuana,
Blasts "the irresponsible, indefensible and unforgivable tactics
used to prevent people in severe pain from using marijuana as a medicine."
July 5, 1999(Marijuananews note: This is a great column, but its source makes it all
the more remarkable. This another case in which the story is the story. ABC News has been
very inconsistent in the quality of its coverage of the cannabis issues. This wasn't
dated, but apparently came out shortly after the IOM report.)
See
"Mom, Dad, What are Drugs?"
and
Prime Time Live's
"Junior High" Journalism
UP IN SMOKE
The Sorry Politics of Medical Marijuana
From ABCnews.com
http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/living/secondopinion/secondopinion_31.html
By Nicholas Regush
Have you ever watched someone who is ill, someone you love, cry and scream with pain
for days, weeks, months, even years?
Your first reaction is to touch or hold that person and hope that you can magically
wish the pain away. But your more practical impulse is to ensure that all medical efforts
have been exhausted to find a medicine that will neutralize or at least dull the pain.
Unfortunately for millions of Americans who live with the pain and numerous discomforts
of cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis and other chronic ailments, the road to
relief is often blockaded by small-minded government bureaucrats, cowardly doctors and
empire builders in the so-called Justice Department.
I am referring to the irresponsible, indefensible and
unforgivable tactics used to prevent people in severe pain from using marijuana as a
medicine. Above all else, the arguments against medical marijuana are essentially efforts
to protect the turf of the federal drug-enforcement Establishment.
Unholy War
The federal government, especially under the staunch leadership of "good boy"
Bill Clinton (who says he never actually inhaled), continues a Jihad against drugs that
grinds through everything in its path and is blind to human medical needs.
See
Drug Czars Office Endorses Arresting,
Jailing Medical Marijuana Smokers;
Canadas Parliament Resumes Historic Medical Marijuana Debate -- NORML Press Release
This week, the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine released its
long-awaited report on the subject. Big deal. A waste of taxpayers' money and everybody's
time. Yes, public opinion is divided on this issue. Yes, there is some evidence that
medical marijuana can be helpful. Yes, there is absolutely no evidence that legalizing
medical marijuana will lead to reefer madness.
See
Column By Authors of
the IOM Report On Medical Marijuana
Shows Why The Public Does Not Trust The Medical Establishment
And Why They Should Not! With Analysis by Richard Cowan
and links
Sure, let's do more research. And let's find a better way to deliver marijuana into the
body so we won't have to smoke the stuff and inhale all those toxic chemicals. But
meanwhile, until we sort out all these things, maybe we should allow some people a few
puffs under careful medical supervision.
We needed this elite scientific panel to remind us of what has been painfully obvious
and reported and editorialized countless times in the medical literature over the years?
Let's get serious.
See
Ottawa Citizen
Practices First Class Journalism
A Brilliantly Insightful Editorial: "Marijuana isnt just a serious issue.
Its huge."
We are dealing with a political issue. I liken it to an infestation, one that has festered
like a slow-growing parasite and taken over the life of the body politic.
Revenuers' Revenge
It all goes back to the Harrison Tax Act of 1914, which required payment of a graduated
occupational tax by all persons who imported, produced, compounded, sold, dealt in,
dispersed or gave away narcotic drugs.
This act didn't mention addicts or addiction. At the time, opium and its derivatives
were widely available, even in patent medicines (like Mrs.Winslow's Soothing Syrup) and
soft drinks.
Although the Harrison Act neither made addiction illegal nor directed doctors one way
or the other about prescribing drugs for addicts, the Supreme Court decided in 1915 that
possession of "smuggled" drugs by an addict was a violation of the act. This
forced addicts to go to doctors - the major legal source of drugs left to them. After the
arrest of a physician who gave four narcotic tablets to a patient, doctors, fearing
prosecution, began abandoning addicts.
From this point, a succession of imaginative interpretations of the Harrison Act
combined with the steady rise in clout of a small Treasury Department unit (later named
the Federal Bureau of Narcotics) to lead inexorably to an all-out war on drugs, including
marijuana.
Criminalization Blows
Today, the huge federal bureaucracy to control drug use has
become a fire-breathing monster.
And it's not about to change its colors quickly. There will never be enough medical
evidence to satisfy people who are convinced that the only way to deal with narcotics use
is to dump massive numbers of people in jail and ban the drugs outright for fear they'll
contaminate all children.
Early this century, this nation could have chosen a more enlightened way of
dealing with narcotic use. It chose criminalization, rather than a more medically-minded
approach for those who needed and wanted it. Well, this Holy War has been a total mess and
dismal failure. The law-and-order crowd blew it then and is blowing
it now.
The good news, I suppose, is that voters in several states have put the medical
marijuana issue on the ballot. California passed a referendum to permit its use.
What's really needed now is a change in federal law, which supersedes state law on
narcotics.
As for those peculiar politicians who remain married to human suffering at any cost,
one recourse is to give them a swift and painful boot out of office.
Nicholas Regush produces medical features for ABCNEWS. In his weekly column, published
Wednesdays, he looks at medical trouble spots, heralds innovative achievements and
analyzes health trends that may greatly influence our lives. His latest book is The
Breaking Point: Understanding Your Potential For Violence.